362 NLRB No. 147
VCNCL, LLC d/b/a Vineyard Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
362 NLRB No. 147
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
VCNL, LLC d/b/a Vineyard Court Nursing and Re-
habilitation Center and Retail Wholesale and
Department Store Union. Case 15–CA–144945
July 14, 2015
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN PEARCE AND MEMBERS JOHNSON
AND MCFERRAN
This is a refusal-to-bargain case in which the Re-
spondent is contesting the Union’s certification as bar-
gaining representative in the underlying representation
proceeding. Pursuant to a charge and an amended charge
filed by Retail Wholesale and Department Store Union
(the Union) on January 23, 2015, and February 4, 2015,
respectively, the General Counsel issued the complaint
on February 6, 2015, alleging that VCNCL, LLC d/b/a
Vineyard Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center (the
Respondent), has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the
Act by refusing the Union’s request to recognize and
bargain following the Union’s certification in Case 15–
RC–114384. (Official notice is taken of the record in the
representation proceeding as defined in the Board’s
Rules and Regulations, Secs. 102.68 and 102.69(g).
Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343 (1982).). The Respond-
ent filed an answer admitting in part and denying in part
the allegations of the complaint.
On May 19, 2015, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment and on May 21, 2015, the Board
issued an order transferring the proceeding to the Board
and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion should not
be granted. The Respondent filed a response.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
The Respondent admits its refusal to bargain but con-
tests the validity of the Union’s certification on the basis
of its objections to the election.1
All representation issues raised by the Respondent
were or could have been litigated in the prior representa-
1 Although the Respondent in its answer to the complaint denies the
dates on which the Union is alleged to have requested bargaining and
further denies that it refused to bargain with the Union, by letter dated
May 14, 2015, attached to the General Counsel’s Motion as Exh. S, the
Respondent stipulated that it has refused to recognize or bargain with
the Union because it is testing certification. The letter acknowledges
that the Union requested bargaining in December 2014, and that by
email dated December 18, 2014, the Respondent informed the Union
that it intended to test certification and has not engaged in bargaining.
tion proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to ad-
duce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously
unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special cir-
cumstances that would require the Board to reexamine
the decision made in the representation proceeding. We
therefore find that the Respondent has not raised any
representation issue that is properly litigable in this un-
fair labor practice proceeding. See Pittsburgh Plate
Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941). Accord-
ingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent has had a place
of business in Columbus, Mississippi (the facility), and
the facility has provided long term residential health
care.2
In conducting its operations annually, the Respondent
derived gross revenues in excess of $100,000, and pur-
chased and received at its Columbus, Mississippi facility
goods valued in excess of $5000 directly from points
outside the State of Mississippi.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and a health care institution within the
meaning of Section 2(14) of the Act and that the Union is
a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5)
of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the representation election held on January
3, 2014, the Union was certified on November 19, 2014,
as the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
employees in the following appropriate unit:
Included: All full time and regular part-time service
and maintenance employees, including the CNAs, Die-
tary Employees, Housekeeping employees, Laundry
employees, Maintenance employees, Activity Employ-
ees, and Social Services Director; Excluded: All Regis-
tered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, MDS Coordi-
2 The Respondent’s answer denies the complaint allegations that it
is a limited liability corporation engaged in providing health care and
nursing services to individuals, but admits that it has a place of business
in Columbus, Mississippi and that the facility provides long-term resi-
dential healthcare. Further, its answer admits all of the complaint’s
jurisdictional allegations, including that it is an employer engaged in
commerce within the meaning of Sec. 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act and
is a health care institution within the meaning of Sec. 2(14) of the Act.
Therefore, we find that the Respondent’s denials do not raise any issues
warranting a hearing.
2
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
nator, Treatment Nurse, QAPI Coordinator, Medical
Records Nurse, Professional employees, Office Clerical
employees, Guards, and Supervisors as defined by the
Act.
The Union continues to be the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit employees under
Section 9(a) of the Act.
B. Refusal to Bargain
In December 2014, the Union, by email and by letter,
requested that the Respondent recognize and bargain
with it as the exclusive collective-bargaining representa-
tive of the unit. Since about December 18, 2014, the
Respondent has failed and refused to recognize and bar-
gain with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit. We find that this
failure and refusal constitutes an unlawful failure and
refusal to recognize and bargain with the Union in viola-
tion of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By failing and refusing since about December 18,
2014, to recognize and bargain with the Union as the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of em-
ployees in the appropriate unit, the Respondent has en-
gaged in unfair labor practices affecting commerce with-
in the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and Section
2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to bargain on request with the Union and, if an
understanding is reached, to embody the understanding
in a signed agreement.
To ensure that employees are accorded the services of
their selected bargaining agent for the period provided by
law, we shall construe the initial period of the certifica-
tion as beginning the date that the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); accord Burnett Construction
Co., 149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57
(10th Cir. 1965); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB 226, 229
(1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied
379 U.S. 817 (1964).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, VCNCL, LLC d/b/a Vineyard Court Nurs-
ing and Rehabilitation Center, Columbus, Mississippi, its
officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to recognize and bargain with
Retail Wholesale and Department Store Union as the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the em-
ployees in the bargaining unit.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclu-
sive collective-bargaining representative of the following
appropriate unit on terms and conditions of employment
and, if an understanding is reached, embody the under-
standing in a signed agreement:
Included: All full time and regular part-time service
and maintenance employees, including the CNAs, Die-
tary Employees, Housekeeping employees, Laundry
employees, Maintenance employees, Activity Employ-
ees, and Social Services Director; Excluded: All Regis-
tered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, MDS Coordi-
nator, Treatment Nurse, QAPI Coordinator, Medical
Records Nurse, Professional employees, Office Clerical
employees, Guards, and Supervisors as defined by the
Act.
(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Columbus, Mississippi, copies of the at-
tached notice marked “Appendix.”3 Copies of the notice,
on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region
15, after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized
representative, shall be posted by the Respondent and
maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous plac-
es, including all places where notices to employees are
customarily posted. In addition to physical posting of
paper notices, notices shall be distributed electronically,
such as by email, posting on an intranet or an internet
site, and/or other electronic means, if the Respondent
customarily communicates with its employees by such
means. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respond-
ent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or
covered by any other material. If the Respondent has
gone out of business or closed the facility involved in
these proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and
mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice to all cur-
rent employees and former employees employed by the
Respondent at any time since December 18, 2014.
3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
VINEYARD COURT NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
3
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director for Region 15 a sworn certifi-
cation of a responsible official on a form provided by the
Region attesting to the steps that the Respondent has
taken to comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. July 14, 2015
______________________________________
Mark Gaston Pearce,
Chairman
______________________________________
Harry I. Johnson, III,
Member
______________________________________
Lauren McFerran,
Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and
obey this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to recognize and bargain
with Retail Wholesale and Department Store Union as
the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the
employees in the bargaining unit.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
listed above.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union and put
in writing and sign any agreement reached on terms and
conditions of employment for our employees in the fol-
lowing bargaining unit:
Included: All full time and regular part-time service
and maintenance employees, including the CNAs, Die-
tary Employees, Housekeeping employees, Laundry
employees, Maintenance employees, Activity Employ-
ees, and Social Services Director; Excluded: All Regis-
tered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses, MDS Coordi-
nator, Treatment Nurse, QAPI Coordinator, Medical
Records Nurse, Professional employees, Office Clerical
employees, Guards, and Supervisors as defined by the
Act.
VCNCL,
LLC
D/B/A
VINEYARD
COURT
NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
The
Board’s
decision
can
be
found
at
www.nlrb.gov/case/15-CA-144945 or by using the QR
code below. Alternatively, you can obtain a copy of the
decision from the Executive Secretary, National Labor
Relations Board, 1015 Half Street, S.E., Washington,
D.C. 20570, or by calling (202) 273–1940.