FTC Docket C-3991
cscagreement
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In the Matter of
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION,
a corporation,
and
MYND CORPORATION,
a corporation.
FILE NO. 001-0181
AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDERS
The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”), having initiated an investigation of the
proposed acquisition by Computer Sciences Corporation (“CSC”) of all the voting securities of
Mynd Corporation (“Mynd”), and it now appearing that CSC and Mynd (collectively, “Proposed
Respondents”) are willing to enter into an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (“Consent
Agreement”) requiring the divestiture of certain assets and providing for other relief,
IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between Proposed Respondents, by their duly
authorized officers and attorneys, and counsel for the Commission that:
1. Computer Sciences Corporation is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business
under and by virtue of the laws of Nevada, with its office and principal place of business
located at 2100 East Grand Avenue, El Segundo, California 90245.
2. Mynd Corporation is a corporation organized, existing, and doing business under and by
virtue of the laws of South Carolina, with its office and principal place of business located at
One Mynd Center, Blythewood, South Carolina 29016. Mynd Corporation was formerly
known as Policy Management Systems Corporation.
3. Proposed Respondents admit all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the draft of Complaint
here attached.
4. Proposed Respondents waive:
a. any further procedural steps;
Agreement Containing Consent Orders
Page 2 of 4
b. the requirement that the Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets attached
hereto and made a part hereof contain a statement of findings of fact and conclusions of
law;
c. all rights to seek judicial review or otherwise to challenge or contest the validity of the
Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets entered pursuant to this Consent
Agreement; and
d. any claim under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
5. Each Proposed Respondent shall submit an initial compliance report at the time it executes
this Consent Agreement and shall submit additional compliance reports every thirty (30) days
thereafter until the accompanying Decision and Order becomes final, pursuant to Commission
Rule 2.33, 16 C.F.R. § 2.33, signed by the Proposed Respondent setting forth in detail the
manner in which the Proposed Respondent has to date complied or has prepared to comply,
and will comply with the accompanying Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain
Assets. Such reports will not become part of the public record unless and until this Consent
Agreement and the accompanying Decision and Order are accepted by the Commission for
public comment.
6. The Commission may issue an Order to Maintain Assets in this matter at any time after it
accepts the Consent Agreement for public comment.
7. This Consent Agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission
by Proposed Respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in the draft of complaint
here attached, or that the facts as alleged in the draft complaint, other than jurisdictional
facts, are true.
8. This Consent Agreement shall not become part of the public record of the proceeding unless
and until it is accepted by the Commission. If this Consent Agreement is accepted by the
Commission it, together with the draft of complaint contemplated thereby, will be placed on
the public record for a period of thirty (30) days and information in respect thereto publicly
released. The Commission thereafter may either withdraw its acceptance of this Consent
Agreement and so notify the Proposed Respondents, in which event it will take such action as
it may consider appropriate, or amend its Complaint if circumstances so require and issue its
Decision and Order, in disposition of the proceeding. Respondents will be permitted to
consummate the transaction addressed in the Complaint, upon receiving early termination of
the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act waiting period.
9. This Consent Agreement contemplates that, if it is accepted by the Commission, the
Commission may (1) issue its Complaint corresponding in form and substance with the draft
complaint here attached, (2) issue and serve its Order to Maintain Assets, and (3) make
information public with respect thereto. If such acceptance is not subsequently withdrawn by
Agreement Containing Consent Orders
Page 3 of 4
the Commission pursuant to the provisions of Commission Rule 2.34, 16 C.F.R. § 2.34, the
Commission may, without further notice to Proposed Respondents, issue the Decision and
Order in disposition of the proceeding. When final, the Decision and Order and the Order to
Maintain Assets shall have the same force and effect, and may be altered, modified or set
aside in the same manner and within the same time provided by statute for other orders. The
Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets shall become final upon service.
Delivery of the Complaint, the Decision & Order, and the Order to Maintain Assets to
Proposed Respondents by any means specified in Commission Rule 4.4(a), 16 C.F.R.
§ 4.4(a), shall constitute service. Proposed Respondents waive any right they may have to
any other manner of service. The Complaint may be used in construing the terms of the
Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets, and no agreement, understanding,
representation, or interpretation not contained in the Decision and Order, Order to Maintain
Assets, or this Consent Agreement may be used to vary or contradict the terms of the
Decision and Order or the Order to Maintain Assets.
10. By signing this Consent Agreement, Proposed Respondents represent and warrant that they
can accomplish the full relief contemplated by the accompanying Decision and Order and the
Order to Maintain Assets (including effectuating all required divestitures, assignments, and
transfers and obtaining all necessary approvals from governmental authorities, leaseholders,
and other third parties to effectuate the divestitures, assignments and transfer, and that all
parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and successors necessary to effectuate the full relief
contemplated by this Consent Agreement are parties to this Consent Agreement.
11. By signing this Consent Agreement, Proposed Respondents represent and warrant that the
ISO Divestiture Agreement, as defined in Paragraph I.F. of the Decision and Order, requires
Proposed Respondents to divest all assets required to be divested pursuant to the Decision
and Order and requires Proposed Respondents to comply with Paragraphs II. and III. of the
Decision and Order and Paragraph II. of the Order to Maintain Assets.
12. Proposed Respondents have read the proposed complaint, the Decision and Order, and the
Order to Maintain Assets contemplated hereby. Proposed Respondents understand that once
the Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets have been issued, they will be
required to file one or more compliance reports showing that they have fully complied with
the Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets. Proposed Respondents agree to
comply with the terms of the proposed Decision and Order and the proposed Order to
Maintain Assets from the date they sign this Consent Agreement. Proposed Respondents
further understand that they may be liable for civil penalties in the amount provided by law
for each violation of the Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets after each of
those orders becomes final.
Agreement Containing Consent Orders
Page 4 of 4
DATED:
COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION
By:
Hayward D. Fisk
General Counsel
Computer Sciences Corporation
Dated: __________, 2000
____________________________
Charles R. Work
McDermott, Will & Emery
Counsel for Computer Sciences Corporation
Dated: __________, 2000
MYND CORPORATION,
By:
Stephen G. Morrison
General Counsel
Mynd Corporation
Dated: __________, 2000
____________________________
John F. Collins
Dewey Ballantine LLP
Counsel for Mynd Corporation
Dated: __________, 2000
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Daniel J. Silver
Jeanine Balbach
Attorneys
APPROVED:
______________________________
Richard Liebeskind
Assistant Director
Bureau of Competition
__________________________
Richard G. Parker
Director
Bureau of Competition