Quality Improvement Organization Manual (Pub. 100-10), Ch. 7 § 7250
Re-review Quality Concern Notices - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
7250 - Re-review Quality Concern Notices - (Rev. 4, 07-18-03)
A. Confirmed Quality Concern Upheld
In addition to the basic elements listed in §7220, the body of these notices must contain
the following elements:
The date of the re-review request;
An explanation that the physician reviewer who conducted the re-review was not
involved in the original quality concern determination;
A statement that the QIO physician reviewer has re-examined the medical record
and any additional information provided by the provider and/or physician;
A summary of the case findings and concerns, including a preferred course of
action which would have improved care, from the Reconsideration/Re-review
Decision portion of the PRAF (Attaching a copy of the PRAF and referring to the
attachment is not acceptable). Although you may reference the categories for
classifying your concerns, do not use the numbering scheme (e.g., A.1, B.3, C.40,
D.99) in your notice;
A brief statement of the action to be taken. Explain that the results of your review
will be entered into your database for pattern analysis, used for your related
pattern analysis activities, and that the physician and provider will have ample
opportunity to discuss any patterns involving quality concerns;
A statement that the re-review determination is final (i.e., no further appeals
apply);
For physician notices, a statement that the provider is also being notified of your
re-review determination. Specify the name of the provider. Do not specify the
name of any other physician(s) you may be notifying; and
For provider notices, a statement that the affected physician(s) is also being
notified of your re-review determination. Specify the name of the physician(s).
B. Confirmed Quality Concern Reversed
In addition to the basic elements listed in §7220, the body of these notices must contain
the following elements:
The date of the re-review request;
An explanation that the physician reviewer who conducted the re-review was not
involved in the original quality concern determination;
A statement that the QIO physician reviewer has re-examined the medical record
and any additional information provided by the provider and/or physician;
A summary of the case findings and concerns, including the basis for your
favorable determination, from the Reconsideration/Re-review Decision portion of
the PRAF (Attaching a copy of the PRAF and referring to the attachment is not
acceptable). Although you may reference the categories for classifying your
concerns, do not use the numbering scheme (e.g., A.1, B.3, C.40, D.99) in your
notice;
A brief statement of the action to be taken. Explain that the results of your review
will be entered into your database for pattern analysis and your pattern analysis
activities;
For physician notices, a statement that the provider is also being notified of your
re-review determination. Specify the name of the provider. Do not specify the
name of any other physician(s) you may be notifying; and
For provider notices, a statement that the affected physician(s) is also being
notified of your re-review determination. Specify the name of the physician(s).