Pub. L. 102-240, tit. I, pt. A, sec. 1106
RURAL AND URBAN ACCESS PROJECTS.
SEC. 1106. RURAL AND URBAN ACCESS PROJECTS. (a) Rural Access Projects.— (1) Purpose.— The purpose of this subsection is to provide funds for projects that ensure better rural access and that promote economic development in rural areas. (2) Authorization of projects.— The Secretary is authorized to carry out rural access projects described in this paragraph. Subject to paragraph (3), there is authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) for fiscal years 1992 through 1997 to carry out each such project the amount listed for each such project: CITY/STATE RURAL ACCESS AMOUNT in millions 1. Cadiz, Ohio Improvements of Short Creek Highway from Cadiz, Ohio to Rayland, Ohio 2.5 2. Boger City, North Carolina Construction of 4-lane divided highway along Highway 321 to Boger City, NC to NC 127 South 14.2 3. Utica, New York Improvement of the Utica North/South Arterial 9.9 4. Oneida County, New York Upgrade a highway to 4 lanes in Oneida County, New York 8.0 5. Southern, Oklahoma Widening of U.S. 70 0 24 6. Southern, Oklahoma Construction of a bridge and approaches at Pennington Creek, OK 10.0 7. Johnsonburg, Pennsylvania Relocation of a 2-lane highway from Center Street to PA Rt. 255 along U.S. 219, Johnsonburg Bypass 14.0 8. Pennsylvania Construction of truck driving lanes and safety improvements on U.S. 219 between 1–80 and the NY State Line 26.0 9. East St. Louis, Illinois Feasibility study for 4-lane Access Road to Jefferson Memorial Park 0.24 105 STAT. 2038 CITY/STATE RURAL ACCESS AMOUNT in millions 10. Illinois To conduct an Environmental Impact Study & Design Study on a 58-mile stretch of U.S. 67 corridor from Alton, IL to Jacksonville, IL 2.5 11. Venice, Illinois For rehabilitation of McKinley Bridge near Venice, IL 5.9 12. Lenoir City, Tennessee Project for replacement of Keller Memorial Bridge, Decatur, AL 12.7 13. Decatur, Alabama Feasibility Study on Fort Loudon Dam Bridge on U.S. Highway 231 in Lenoir City, TN 0.5 14. Blount City, Tennessee Improvement of U.S. Highway #411 in Monroe and Blount Counties, TN 15.7 15. Missouri For improvements of Highway 60 in New Madrid, Stoddard, Carter and Butler Counties, MO 21.7 16. Southern, Missouri Improvement of Rt. 65 through Greene, Christian and Taney Counties, MO 14.1 17. Lake Charles, Louisiana Construction of roads and bridge to provide access to Rose Bluff Industrial Area, Lake Charles, LA 4.1 18. Louisiana For improvement and extension of Ambassador Caffery Parkway in Louisiana 14.9 19. Ohio Construction of U.S. Rt. 68 Bypass in Clark, Champaign and Logan Counties 15.8 20. Aliquippa, Pennsylvania For various 3-R Projects in Aliquippa, PA 12.8 21. Riverton, Kansas Construction of a new highway from Riverton, KS to Interstate 44 in Missouri 13.1 22. North Minnesota Construction and reconstruction of Forest Highway 11 connecting Aurora-Hoyt Lakes and Silver Bay, MN 9.5 23. Richfield, Minnesota 77th Street Reconstruction Project, Richfield, MN 11.6 24. Mississippi Improvements on Highway 84 in Franklin and Lincoln Counties, MS 9.5 25. Mississippi Upgrading of U.S. Highway 98 from County line of Pike and Waltham Counties, MS to Lamar County, MS 0.4 26. Mississippi Upgrading Highway 61 from Natchez, MS to Louisiana State line 0.35 27. Mississippi Upgrading Highway 84 from Brookhaven, MS to U.S. 49 in Collins, MS 2.1 28. Chattahoochee, Florida Construction of Mosquito Creek Bridge 2.4 29. Florida To upgrade State Rt. 71 from State Rt. 10 to State Rt. 8 2.9 30. Florida To upgrade Florida State Rt. 267 from State Rt. 8 to State Rt. 10 4.7 31. Illinois Tollway feasibility study (East St. Louis to Carbondale, IL) 0.32 32. Mt. Vernon, Illinois Extension of 34th Street from IL Rt. 15 to County Road 10 0.96 105 STAT. 2039 CITY/STATE RURAL ACCESS AMOUNT in millions 33. Illinois Reconstruction of Feather Trail Road from Ullin Road Interchange to Rt. 37, Pulaski County, IL 1.1 34. Illinois Resurfacing IL Rt. 1 from Cave-In-Rock to north of Omaha 1.8 35. Williamson County, Illinois Upgrading IL Rt. 13 in Williamson County, IL 7.8 36. Sedine County, Illinois For improvements to Rt. 13 from Williamson-Saline County line to Harrisburg, IL 4 37. Winchester, New Hampshire Replacement of Winchester Bridge, Winchester, NH 0.8 38. Hanover, New Hampshire Ledyard Bridge reconstruction 7.8 39. Asheville, North Carolina U.S. 19–23 improvement project, Asheville, NC 11.1 40. Niles, Ohio Belmont Street Bridge Replacement, Niles, OH 1.2 41. Struthers, Ohio Bridge Street Bridge replacement, Struthers, OH 1.2 42. Niles, Ohio South Main Street Bridge replacement, Niles, OH 2.5 43. St. Joseph County, Michigan U.S. 131, St. Joseph County, MI 0.5 44. Berrien County, Michigan U.S. 31 relocation, Berrien County, MI 17.4 45. Holland, Michigan U.S. 31 upgrade, Holland, Ottawa County, MI 1.3 46. North Carolina I–85 Interchange improvement at State Route 1103 Granville County, NC 1.7 47. Manchester, New Hampshire Manchester Airport Road improvements 4.0 48. New Hampshire Wetlands mitigation package for New Hampshire Rt. 101/51 10.0 49. Arkansas To improve U.S. 65 from Harrison, Arkansas to Missouri Line 38.0 50. Arkansas To improve Phoenix Avenue in the vicinity of the Ft. Smith Airport, Ft. Smith, Arkansas 7.9 51. Arkansas To study bypass alternatives for U.S. 71 in the vicinity of Bella Vista, Arkansas 3.0 52. Bedford Springs, Pennsylvania To construct an access road along Old U.S. 220 to the Springs Project and to construct other facilities to facilitate movement of traffic within the site and construction of a parking facility to be associated therewith 19.7 53. DeValls Bluff, Arkansas Construction of a replacement bridge across the White River 2.5 54. Jonesboro, Arkansas Complete construction of 3 interchanges on the Highway 63 Bypass at Jonesboro 5.7 55. Brevard County, Florida Design and engineer improvements for State Rd. 3 between State Rd. 520 and State Rd. 528 0.16 56. Louisiana For construction of a new road from an area in the vicinity of I–55 to Alexandria, Louisiana 1.7 105 STAT. 2040 CITY/STATE RURAL ACCESS AMOUNT in millions 57. Beaumont, Texas Widen Highway FM-364 from a 2-lane to a 4-lane road 10.4 58. Farmington Hills, Michigan To widen 12-mile road corridor in the vicinity of Farmington Hills, Michigan 2.5 59. Laredo, Texas Expand capacity of 2-lane highway, construct interchanges and connector highway 7.4 60. Montewma, Colorado Upgrade farm to market road serving Ute Indian Reservation 2.9 61. Lubbock, Texas Initiate feasibility and route studies and preliminary engineering and design for highway to connect Lubbock with Interstate 20 2.9 62. Rosenberg, Texas To purchase right-of-way for Highway 36 B3rpass West of Rosenberg, Texas 0.9 63. Angleton, Texas For various activities associated with relocation of Highway 288 in vicinity of Angleton, Texas 0.9 64. Mentor, Ohio For construction of an interchange on State Rt. 615 at 1–90 in Mentor, Ohio 4.7 65. W. Central, Illinois For widening of U.S. 34 between Burlington, Iowa and Monmouth, Illinois 1.9 66. Illinois To make improvements including construction of a bridge on U.S. 67 in NW Illinois 2.4 67. Monongahela Valley, Pennsylvania For construction of southernmost extension of the Monongahela Expressway 14 68. Dauphin County, Pennsylvania Design, acquire right-of-way and reconstruct 5.1 miles of 4-lane divided highway from Dauphin Borough to Speeceville, Pennsylvania 12 69. Rutherford County, Tennessee Replace existing bridge over the west fork of the Stone’s River including a 5-foot elevated walkway 0.8 70. Wayne County, New York To improve Rt. 104 from Furnace Road to Pound Road in the Wayne County Area of New York 6.4 71. Chautauqua County, New York Construct 2 additional expressway lanes from Chautauqua Lake Bridge to Pennsylvania Border 17.0 72. North Carolina To reimburse the State of North Carolina for construction and repair of the Bonner Bridge, North Carolina 3.0 73. North Carolina Construct interstate link between I–95 and I–40 in vicinity of Wilson and Goldsboro, North Carolina 8.9 74. Bossier City, Louisiana To study grade separations along 10 miles of KC Railroad along U.S. 71 0.16 105 STAT. 2041 CITY/STATE RURAL ACCESS AMOUNT in millions 75. Pennsylvania Widen 14-mile segment of U.S. 15 from 2 to 4 lanes 13.8 76. Overland Park, Kansas I–435 Interchange Project 4.1 77. Fairmont, West Virginia Riverside Expressway improvements 5.3 78. Washington State Rt. 14 Improvement Projects, Columbia River Gorge, Wasnington 8.6 79. Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Industrial Park access, Washington County, Pennsylvania 6.3 80. Pennsylvania Chadville Improvement Project, Southern Fayette County, Pennsylvania 2.4 81. Pennsylvania U.S. Rt. 219 Meyersdale Bypass 48 82. Pennsylvania U.S. Rt. 22 Improvements: Monroeville to Ebansburg 30.3 83. Pennsylvania Laurel Valley Expressway, Blairsville, Pennsylvania 5.0 84. Brownsville, Texas Brownsville Railroad Relocation Project 6.7 85. South Carolina Southern Connector Highway, Greenville County, South Carolina 3.6 86. Ohio Rt. 18 Bypass Study, Medina, Ohio 0.4 87. Ohio U.S. Rt. 250 Bypass Study, Norwalk, Ohio 0.4 88. Mankato, Minnesota Mankato South Rt. Improvements, Mankato, Minnesota 10.0 89. Kentucky U.S. 119 Upgrading, Pike County, KY 7.6 90. Michigan U.S. Rt. 127 Upgrading, Jackson County, Michigan 0.8 91. Eden Prairie & Cologne, Minnesota U.S. Trunk Highway 212 improvement project, Eden Prairie/Cologne, MN 8.7 92. Ohio Rt. 30 extension: East Canton/Minerva, Ohio 5.3 93. New Mexico Raton-Clayton Rd., Clayton, New Mexico 9.3 94. New Mexico Jicarilla Apache State Road, New Mexico 1.5 95. Arizona Turquoise Trail Highway, Navajo County, Arizona 5.9 96. Pennsylvania U.S. Rt. 222 Relocation, Lehigh County, Pennsylvania 1.5 97. Pennsylvania Pennsylvania Rt. 33 Extension, Northhampton County, Pennsylvania 16.8 98. Kentucky Highway 92 Relocation Study, South Central Kentucky 0.1 99. Kentucky U.S. 27 Improvements, Jessamine County, Kentucky 9.2 100. North Carolina U–2519/X–2 Highways, Cumberland, North Carolina 15.9 101. Missouri Adams Dairy Parkway Project, Blue Springs, Missouri 1.5 102. Lawrence, Kansas Lawrence Circumferential Roadway, Douglas County, Kansas 3.3 103. Kansas Oakland Expressway, Eastern Shawnee, Kansas 5.9 104. Missouri Highway 63 improvements, Columbia, Missouri/Iowa border 5.9 105 STAT. 2042 CITY/STATE RURAL ACCESS AMOUNT in millions 105. West Virginia Highway Improvements: Mason County/Kanawha, West Virginia 19.5 106. Pennsylvania Warren Street Extension/U.S. 222 Reconstruction, Berks County, Pennsylvania 6.6 107. Illinois For construction of the Alton Bypass from the vicinity of Alton and Godfrey, Illinois 4.4 108. Iowa Construct Mason City Bypass, Gerro Gordo County, Iowa 14.8 109. Prince Edward County, Virginia A highway improvement project one mile south of Farmville in Prince Edward County, Virginia, to increase from two lanes to four lanes approximately two miles of Route 460. Such project shall connect the existing four lanes of Route 460 approaching the segment from the east and the west. The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is directed, upon request of officials representing Prince Edward County, Virginia, to allow the immediate filling of the Sandy River Reservoir in accordance with the terms and conditions of the permit, without further amendment or modification in any respect, issued by the Department of the Army relating to the reservoir, except that no contingency in such permit pertaining to water demand or use shall become effective or shall be enforced prior to seven years from date of completion of such highway project 4.4 110. Port Lavaca to Cuero, Texas Construct upgraded, improved four-lane divided highway 43.9 111. Parker County, Texas (SH199) Upgrade existing highway to four-lane divided highway 33.5 112. Howell County, Missouri Improve Highway 63 3.6 113. Louisa, Louisiana Louisa Bridge replacement, Louisa, LA 9.5 114. Travis County, Texas Highway 620 bridge improvement 11.4 115. Latrobe, Pennsylvania Ligonier Street Reconstruction 0.8 116. Carroltown/DuBois, Pennsylvania U.S. 219 Improvements 4.0 117. Robinson Township, Pennsylvania Design Work in Town Center 5.0 118. West Virginia Chelyan Bridge Replacement 8.5 (3) Allocation percentages.— 8 percent of the amount allocated by paragraph (2) for each project authorized by paragraph (2) shall be available for obligation in fiscal year 1992. 18.4 percent of such amount shall be available for obligation in each of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. 105 STAT. 2043 (4) Federal share.— The Federal share payable on account of any project under this subsection shall be 80 percent of the cost thereof. (5) Delegation to states.— Subject to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall delegate responsibility for construction of a project or projects under this subsection to the State in which such project or projects are located upon request of such State. (6) Advance construction.— When a State which has been delegated responsibility for construction of a project under this subsection— (A) has obligated all funds allocated under this subsection for construction of such project; and (B) proceeds to construct such project without the aid of Federal funds in accordance with all procedures and all requirements applicable to such project, except insofar as such procedures and requirements limit the State to the construction of projects with the aid of Federal funds previously allocated to it; the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost of construction of the project when additional funds are allocated for such project under this subsection. (7) Applicability of title 23.— Funds authorized by this subsection shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, except that the Federal share of the cost of any project under this subsection shall be determined in accordance with this subsection and such funds shall remain available until expended. Funds authorized by this subsection shall not be subject to any obligation limitation. (b) Urban Access and Urban Mobility Projects.— (1) Purpose.— The purpose of this subsection is to provide funds for projects that enhance urban access and urban mobility. (2) Authorization of projects.— The Secretary is authorized to carry out urban access and urban mobility projects described in this paragraph. Subject to paragraph (3), there is authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) for fiscal years 1992 through 1997 to carry out each such project the amount listed for each such project: CITY/STATE URBAN ACCESS & MOBILITY AMOUNT in millions 1. Santa Ana, California Bristol Street Project 4.1 2. Illinois/Missouri Metro East/St. Louis, Missouri Bridge Feasibility Study 1.0 3. Beaver/Butler Counties, Pennsylvania Construction of Crow’s Run Expressway from I–79 to PA Rt. 60, Beaver/Butler Counties, PA 3.5 4. Atlanta, Georgia Improvement of Martin Luther King Drive 0.8 5. Chicago, Illinois Handicapped Accessibility Projects on various Chicago Streets 2.4 105 STAT. 2044 CITY/STATE URBAN ACCESS & MOBILITY AMOUNT in millions 6. Chicago, Illinois Feasibility study for a road between existing Lake Shore Drive and Indiana Road 0.16 7. San Jose, California Improvement of Interchange at Highway 85/Highway 17 35.0 8. Gilroy, California For safety improvements on Highway 152 in vicinity of Gilroy, CA 5.9 9. New York, New York Improvements on Miller Highway in New York City, NY 15.6 10. District of Columbia Construction of missing segments of Eastern and Southern Avenues (Boundary Street Safety Initiative) 6.8 11. Buffalo, New York Scagaquada Expressway Classification study 0.24 12. Buffalo, New York NY State Thruway relocation study, Buffalo (Niagara), NY 0.24 13. Joliet, Illinois For rehabilitation of Houbolt Road from Jefferson Street to Joliet Jr. College and construction and interchange at Houbolt Road and I–80 1.0 14. Chicago, Illinois WPA street improvements bounded on the north by 103rd, the east by Stoney Island, the west by Ahnland, and the south by the city limits 3.7 15. Burnham, Illinois To improve Dolton Avenue between Torrence Avenue and Indiana State Line, Burnham, IL 1.9 16. Calumet Park, Illinois Ashland Avenue Bridge replacement 2.1 17. Harvey, Illinois Illinois 1 Interchange improvement from U.S. 6 to I–80 2.5 18. Markham, Illinois Sibley Boulevard traffic flow improvement from Dixie Highway 3.5 19. Chicago, Illinois Illinois 1 intersection improvement, Harvey, IL (intersection at 155th Street) 1.4 20. Youngstown, Ohio Center Street Bridge replacement, Youngstown, OH, including Poland Avenue—Shirley Road connector and ramps at I–680 12.2 21. Lake Porter and LaPort Counties, Indiana and Illinois Study linkage roads to connect Lake Shore Drive and surrounding facilities 1.0 22. Indiana Acquisition of West Lake Corridor Right-of-Way between Munster, IN and Hammond, IN 1.0 23. Portage, Indiana Widen Willow Creek Road to 4 lanes 1.5 24. Hobart, Lake Station and New Chicago, Indiana Various improvements to Ridge Road to relieve congestion 4.3 25. Passaic County, New Jersey To complete construction of Rt. 21 in Passaic County, New Jersey 98.8 26. Northeastern, New Jersey To raise 14 bridges over Molly Ann’s Brook Northeastern, New Jersey 9.5 105 STAT. 2045 CITY/STATE URBAN ACCESS & MOBILITY AMOUNT in millions 27. Chambersburg, Pennsylvania To improve the Wayne Avenue—I–81 Interchange and to widen Wayne Avenue to 5 lanes from Kriner Road to Coldbrook Avenue in the vicinity of Chambersburg, Pennsylvania 1.84 28. Newark, New Jersey To construct ramps to provide access to I–78 7.2 29. Newark, New Jersey To construct a parking facility as part of a multi-modal transportation facility in the vicinity of United Hospitals Medical Center, Newark, New Jersey 4.9 30. Lawrence, Massachusetts Study, design, and construct new road service; road and ramps and widen I–495 47 31. Baltimore, Maryland To improve various roads as part of project “Project Vision” in Baltimore, Maryland 5.0 32. Bellevue, Washington Conduct Phase I design study for I–405 interchange at Northeast 8th Street 5.0 33. Springfield, Illinois To extend 11th Street from Stevenson Drive to Toronto Road in the vicinity of Springfield, Illinois 8.3 34. Middlesex, New Jersey Route 1 widening in Middlesex County, New Jersey from Raritan River to Rahway River 7.4 35. Perth Amboy & Woodbridge Township, New Jersey Study whether additional river crossings may be necessary based on condition of 3 existing crossings 2.5 36. Compton, California For a grade separation project at W. Alameda Street and the Mealy St. Corridor 6.6 37. Parsippany, Troy Hills, New Jersey Construct interchange and ramp improvements for east and west bound traffic on I–280 3.1 38. Queens, New York To rehabilitate 39th Street Bridge over rail tracks at the Sunnyside Rail Yard in Queens, New York 10.4 39. Omaha, Nebraska For improvements to US Highway 6 (W. Dodge Road) from 86th Street to 118th including the intersection with I–680 in Omaha, Nebraska 5.2 40. Suffolk County/Long Island, New York Construct various roadway improvements on 7.1 miles of New York Rt. 112, including, resurfacing, widening, adding turning and parking lanes and improving traffic signals 3.4 41. San Diego, California To conduct environmental study on feasibility of constructing 4-lane highway from State Rt. 805 to International border near Otay Mesa 1.0 105 STAT. 2046 CITY/STATE URBAN ACCESS & MOBILITY AMOUNT in millions 42. Sarasota, Florida To construct a bridge interchange at US 301 and University Parkway in the vicinity of Sarasota, Florida 2.4 43. Hartford, Connecticut To rehabilitate Connecticut Rt. 99 South of Hartford, Connecticut 5.0 44. Hartford, Connecticut For improved access to the Connecticut River as in I–91 Mitigation Project, Hartford, Connecticut 2.3 45. Chattanooga, Tennessee Construct an urban diamond interchange to improve capacity and a connector road 3.1 46. Commerce, California To relocate a portion of Atlantic Blvd. in the vicinity of Telegraph Rd. as part of a grade separation project 4.7 47. Scranton, Pennsylvania Realign 3,000 feet of N. Scranton Expressway to connect with Mulberry Street 7.2 48. Long Island, New York Southern State Parkway Improvement 4.6 49. New York Exit 26 Ridge Project Schenectady, New York 5.7 50. Capital Beltway, Springfield, Virginia Upgrade interchanges on I–495, including Virginia Mixing Bowl Improvements 7.5 51. Utah Expansion of State Rd. 5600 West 3.3 52. Chicago, Illinois Right-of-way preservation projects (Eisenhower & Stevenson Connector) 4.8 53. Chicago, Illinois Museum of Science & Industry: Various intermodal facilities, Chicago, Illinois 35.0 54. Chicago, Illinois Chicago Skyway Bridge, Chicago, Illinois 14.2 55. Chicago, Illinois Cermak Road Bridge reconstruction, Chicago, Illinois 9.2 56. Chicago, Illinois Roosevelt Rd. and Bridge Improvements, Chicago, Illinois 11.8 56A. Chicago, Illinois State Street Mall Improvements, Chicago, Illinois 14.2 57. Chicago, Illinois Cicero Avenue Improvements, vicinity of Chicago, Illinois 1.1 58. Chicago, Illinois 183rd Street Reconstruction, Chicago, Illinois 1.5 59. Chicago, Illinois 111th Street Reconstruction, Chicago, Illinois 2.5 60. Chicago, Illinois 111th Street Upgrade: Cicero Avenue to Pulaski Road, Chicago, Illinois 2.5 61. Chicago, Illinois 111th Street Widening; Central Avenue to Cicero Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 4.7 62. Muncie, Indiana State Rd. 67 Widening 10.0 63. Columbus, Indiana Columbus Entranceway project, Columbus, Indiana 3.3 64. New Jersey Rt. 17/4 Interchange Project, Paramus, New Jersey 5.7 65. New Jersey Hackensack Avenue/Kinderkamack Road Bridges over Rt. 4, Hackensack, New Jersey 5.7 66. Los Angeles Grade separation projects (3), Los Angeles County, California 7.1 105 STAT. 2047 CITY/STATE URBAN ACCESS & MOBILITY AMOUNT in millions 67. New York Preservation of Rail Corridor (North Shore Rail Line), Staten Island 10.7 68. Maryland Improvement of U.S. Route 1 in Baltimore County, Maryland 11.8 69. Camden, New Jersey Renovation of South Jersey Port Corporation’s Beckett Street Terminal 8.3 70. Washington, D.C Design and construction of noise barriers along Southeast/Southwest Freeway and Anacostia Freeway in D.C 4.7 71. Anaheim, California Construction of public HOV facilities to provide public access to I–5 in the vicinity of the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Complex 14.8 72. Atlanta, Georgia Construction of I–20 interchange at Lithonia Industrial Boulevard 11.2 73. Buffalo, New York The Southtowns Connector Buffalo, New York 8.5 74. Tucson, Arizona Veterans Memorial Interchange/Palo Verde Overpass Bridge Replacement 2.4 75. Providence, Rhode Island Memorial Boulevard Pedestrian/Traffic Improvements 5.0 76. Renton, Washington Houser Way Relocation Expansion 3.0 (3) Allocation percentages.— 8 percent of the amount allocated by paragraph (2) for each project authorized by paragraph (2) shall be available for obligation in fiscal year 1992. 18.4 percent of such amount shall be available for obligation in each of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. (4) Federal share.— The Federal share payable on account of any project under this subsection shall be 80 percent of the cost thereof. (5) Delegation to states.— Subject to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall delegate responsibility for construction of a project or projects under this subsection to the State in which such project or projects are located upon request of such State. (6) Advance construction.— When a State which has been delegated responsibility for construction of a project under this subsection— (A) has obligated all funds allocated under this subsection for construction of such project; and (B) proceeds to construct such project without the aid of Federal funds in accordance with all procedures and all requirements applicable to such project, except insofar as such procedures and requirements limit the State to the construction of projects with the aid of Federal funds previously allocated to it; the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost of construction of the project when additional funds are allocated for such project under this subsection. 105 STAT. 2048 (7) Applicability of title 23.— Funds authorized by this subsection shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, except that the Federal share of the cost of any project under this subsection shall be determined in accordance with this subsection and such funds shall remain available until expended. Funds authorized by this subsection shall not be subject to any obligation limitation.