INNOVATIVE PROJECTS.

SEC. 1107. INNOVATIVE PROJECTS. (a) In General.— The purpose of this section is to provide assistance for highway projects demonstrating innovative techniques of highway construction and finance. Each State in which 1 of the projects authorized by subsection (b) is located shall select and use, in carrying out such project, innovative techniques in highway construction or finance. Such techniques may include state-of-the-art technology for pavement, safety, or other aspects of highway construction; innovative financing techniques; or accelerated procedures for construction. (b) Authorization of Projects.— The Secretary is authorized to carry out the innovative projects described in this subsection. Subject to subsection (c), there is authorized to be appropriated out of the Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) for fiscal years 1992 through 1997 to carry out each such project the amount listed for each such project: CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 1. Cadiz, Ohio Construction of 4-lane Limited Access Highway from Cadiz, OH to Interstate 70 Interchange at St. Clairsville, OH along U.S. Rt. 250 20.0 2. Maryland Construction of Durham Road Bridge #75 in Harford County, MD 0.5 3. Maryland Construction of a replacement bridge at Furnace Road Bridge #74, Harford County, MD 0.6 4. Maryland Construction of a replacement bridge at South Hampton Road Bridge #47, Harford County, MD 1.0 5. Maryland Construction of a replacement bridge at Wheel Road Bridge #9, Harford County, MD 1.0 6. Maryland Construction of a replacement bridge at Watervale Bridge #63, Harford County, MD 1.1 7. Baltimore County, Maryland Replacement Papermill Road Bridge #123 in Cockeysville Area of Baltimore, MD 5.3 8. Southern, Oklahoma Testing of effectiveness of recyclable materials on a resurfacing project on U.S. 70 in Southern, OK 2.1 9. Tulsa, Oklahoma Upgrade U.S. 75 to Expressway standards, Tulsa, OK 14.0 105 STAT. 2049 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 10. Atlanta, Georgia For various transportation improvements in connection with the 1996 Olympics, including the city of Atlanta advanced traffic management system (IVHS) 58.1 11. Chicago, Illinois Computerized infrastructure management systems, Chicago, IL 4.3 12. Oceanside, California Construction of A, B, and C segments of State Route 76 14.4 13. Carlsbad, California Improvements to the interchange at Palomar Airport Road and Interstate 5 3.4 14. Danville, Virginia To replace bridges on Main and Worsham Streets in Danville, VA 10.0 15. Mokena, Illinois For construction of Wolf Road to an area between LaPort Road and U.S. Rt. 30 in Mokena, IL 1.4 16. Frankfort, Illinois Village of Frankfort Roadway improvement projects 1.3 17. Plainfield, Illinois Replacement of E J & E Viaduct over IL Rt. 59 and Dupage River Tributary 1.0 18. Romeoville, Illinois Replacement of 135th Street Bridge, Romeoville, IL 5.9 19. Water Street, Pennsylvania Construction of a 2 lane bypass around the Borough of Water Street on U.S. 22 of Pennsylvania 8.0 20. Holidaysburg, Pennsylvania To relocate U.S. 22 around the Borough of Holidaysburg, Pennsylvania 52.0 21. Lewistown, Pennsylvania For safety improvements on the Narrows to eliminate potential problems brought on by rock slides 1.6 22. Pennsylvania To relocate U.S. Rt. 22 North of Lewistown, Pennsylvania 58 3 23. Reedsville, Pennsylvania For construction of a 4 lane highway between Reedsville and Seven Mountains, Pennsylvania 35.1 24. Pennsylvania To relocate section of railroad tracks between Hagerstown, Maryland and Shippensburg, Pennsylvania to eliminate 23 at-grade crossings and to make connection to an existing railroad line 14 4 25. Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania To upgrade to 3 lanes by adding a center turning lane a section of Pennsylvania 36 from New U.S. 220 to the intersection at Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania 8.8 26. Altoona, Pennsylvania To widen and extend Chestnut Avenue from Altoona to Juniata, Pennsylvania 7.12 27. Bedford County, Pennsylvania To widen Rt. 30 from the Narrows in Bedford to Mt. Dallas, Pennsylvania 48.0 105 STAT. 2050 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 28. Brevard County, Florida Design, acquire right-of-way and construct a widened bridge on State Road 3 over the Barge Canal 6.9 29. Blacksburg, Montgomery County, Virginia Construction of 6 mile 4 lane highway to demonstrate intelligent/vehicle highway systems 5.9 30. Mobile, Alabama For reconstruction of the West Tunnel Plaza Interchange on I–10 from Virginia Street to Mobile River Tunnel, Mobile, Alabama 15.0 31. Pennsylvania To widen U.S. Rt. 202 from King of Prussia to Montgomeryville, Pennsylvania 8.9 32. Galina, Illinois To conduct environmental, preliminary engineering and design studies to widen a 47 mile stretch of U.S. 20 to 4 lanes 2.0 33. Areneck County, Michigan To improve a 12-mile stretch of U.S. 23 between Rt. 13 and Rt. 65, Michigan 4.7 34. Brooks, Jim Wells, and Live Oak Counties, Texas To improve, upgrade and widen U.S. 281 to the Mexican Border 27.6 35. Alabama To construct a 4-lane access controlled highway to bypass Montgomery, Alabama and connect I–65 and I–85 11.8 36. North Dakota To design computerized system to inventory and manage off system bridge repairs or replacement statewide; begin repair activities 8.9 37. Los Angeles, California For preliminary work on a project to enhance the capacity of I–5 in Los Angeles and Orange County from the downtown area to the State Rt. 91 interchange in Buena Park 6.7 38. Mendon, Illinois To construct 14.8 miles of Highway 336 from Illinois Rt. 61 near Mendon, Illinois to West Point Road 5.0 39. Bryden, Washington Construct 3 miles of new and improved highways connecting Clarkston, Washington with Lewiston, Idaho 3.9 40. Missouri To widen I–55 between Rt. M and Rt. 67 in Jefferson County, Missouri 5.1 41. Jefferson County, Missouri To upgrade 7.9 miles of Missouri Highway 21 in Jefferson County, Missouri 5.1 42. St. Louis, Missouri To construct a 4-lane outer beltway connecting I–55 and I–44 in St. Louis and Jefferson County, Missouri 7.6 43. Hillsborough, Florida Widen and enhance safety and drainage features of I–4 from Tampa to the Hillsborough County Line 24.5 105 STAT. 2051 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 44. Wichita, Kansas To construct a 6 lane access controlled highway and interchange at Oliver Street 6.6 45. Brigham City, Utah To construct an interchange on I–15 at Forest St. in Brigham City, Utah 3.6 46. Utah For the upgrading of U.S. 89 in Davis and Weber Counties, Utah 3.0 47. Grand Rapids, Michigan For construction of a bypass around Grand Rapids, Michigan connecting I–96 and I–196 6.9 48. Suffolk County/Long Island, New York Avoid erecting costly areas through selective black topping through high noise road segments 2.0 49. Suffolk County, New York Evaluate suitability of composting and recycling for use on Federalaid highway medians and perimeters 0.4 50. Springfield, South Dakota Plan, engineer and construct a bridge across the Missouri River to connect South Dakota Rt. 37 to Nebraska Highway 12 4.7 51. Vermillion, South Dakota Engineer and construct bridge across the Missouri River in the vicinity of Vermillion, South Dakota 3.6 52. Pennsylvania Design, engineer and construct 2 exits off Interstate 81 at Wilkes-Barre and Mountaintop, Pennsylvania 16.7 53. Genesse, Michigan Widen and improve pavement in Mundy Township, from Baldwin Rd. to Cook Rd 0.16 54. Flint, Michigan Engineer, design and construct improved and widened 5-lane road 0.5 55. Flint, Michigan Engineer, design and construct 1.02 miles of 5-lane roadway 0.9 56. Flint, Michigan Right-of-way acquisition, relocation and construction of Bristol Road 3.1 57. Salem, Oregon To construct the Salem Bypass around Salem, Oregon 6.0 58. Montgomeryrville, Pennsylvania To improve U.S. 202 from Montgomeryville to Doylestown, Pennsylvania 10.8 59. Amherst/Erie County, New York Widen 2 miles of Rt. 263 from 2 lanes to 4 lanes and rehabilitate a 4 mile stretch of Rt. 78 7.6 60. Idaho To improve the Bryden Canyon Rd. in Lewiston, Idaho 5.3 61. Mojave, California Widen and reconstruct bridge to CALTRANS height standards 1.8 62. Freemont, Iowa For construction of Iowa highway #2 from Sidney, Iowa to I–29 in Freemont County, Iowa 8.7 63. Council Bluffs, Iowa For a variety of improvements to the Valley View Corridor in Council Bluffs, Iowa 1.0 64. Indiana Construct extension of Interstate 69 to link Evansville and Indianapolis, Indiana 3.8 105 STAT. 2052 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 65. Aberdeen, Ohio U.S. 62 Ohio River Bridge 15.5 66. Jacksonville, Illinois U.S. 67 Jacksonville Bypass 15.8 67. Snohomish, Washington Snohomish County, Washington HOV Lanes 6.5 68. Portland/S. Portland, Maine Portland-S. Portland Bridge 134.5 69. Iowa Highway 63 Improvements, Waterloo to New Hampton, Iowa 15.1 70. Brook Park, Ohio Aerospace Technology Park Access Rd., Brook Park, Ohio 14.2 71. California Rt. 156 Hollister Bypass, San Benito, California 0.9 72. Monterey, California Rt. 101, Prunedale, California 4.2 73. New Jersey Rt. 21 Viaduct, Newark, New Jersey, City of Newark’s Project 14.8 74. New Jersey Rt. 21 widening, Newark, New Jersey, City of Newark’s Project 13.9 75. North Carolina U.S. 64 widening in Chatham and Wake Counties, North Carolina 5.3 76. Tennessee I–81/Industrial Park South Interchange, Sullivan County, Tennessee 5.8 77. Tennessee Foothills Parkway: Pittman Center to Cosby, Tennessee 11.2 78. Ohio Kelly Avenue extension, Akron, Ohio 9.5 79. Exton, Pennsylvania Exton Bypass, Exton, Pennsylvania 26.8 80. Alabama Black Warrier River Bridge, Tuscaloosa County, Alabama 6.4 81. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota Highway 610 crosstown project, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 36.0 82. California I–880/Alvarado-Niles Road Interchange, Union City, California 9.5 83. Merrysville, Washington Interstate 5 Interchange improvement: 88th Street, Merrysville, Washington 1.9 84. Myrtle Beach, South Carolina Carolina Bays Parkway, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 5.9 85. Mississippi U.S. 90 improvements including 6 lane bridge and approaches, Pascagoula, Mississippi 4.3 86. Bakersfield, California Rt. 58 Improvements, Bakersfield, California 4.7 87. Santa Fe Springs, California Norwalk Blvd. grade separation, Santa Fe Springs 4.7 88. Hoquiam, Washington Gray’s Harbor Industrial Corridor Bridge, Hoquiam, Washington 4.7 89. Traverse City, Michigan Traverse City Bypass, Traverse City, Michigan 4.5 90. Nevada Lamoille Highway widening, Elko County, Nevada 2.4 91. Reno, Nevada U.S. 395 Extension, in vicinity of Reno, Nevada 14.8 92. Carson City, Nevada Carson City Bypass, Carson City, Nevada 7.6 93. Columbus, Ohio I–270 North outerbelt widening, Franklin County, Ohio 10.2 94. St. Thomas, Virgin Islands Feasibility study of constructing a second road to the west end of the island 1.7 95. Illinois DeQuoin Highway Bridge 2.6 96. Illinois Tamarack Street Extension 0.6 105 STAT. 2053 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 97. Indiana East Chicago Marina Access Road 8.5 98. District of Columbia Hybrid Fuel Cell 3.6 99. Ohio Rehabilitation of Bridge on U.S. 224 near State Route 616 1.0 100. Arkansas North Belt Freeway Project, Thornton, Arkansas 8.9 101. Ft. Worth, Texas I–35 Basswood Interchange, Ft. Worth, Texas 17.8 102. Illinois Illinois 17 road replacement, .2 miles west of Splear Road to Illinois 1: 5.3 miles 1.8 103. Leroy, Illinois U.S. 150 road replacement, North of Hemlock Street to South of Gilmore Street in Leroy: 1.6 miles 1.0 104. Ford County, Illinois U.S. 24 replacement, 1.1 miles east of Forrest to Ford County Line: 8.0 miles 1.8 105. Illinois U.S. 24 road replacement: Crescent City to Illinois 1 in Watseka: 6.3 miles 2.5 106. Emington, Illinois Emington Spur road replacement Illinois 47 to Emington: 2.9 miles Emington, Illinois 0.65 107. Illinois New Lenox Road Improvement 2.5 108. Illinois Shorewood Roadway Improvements 1.3 109. Illinois Bridge painting of various moveable bridges to prevent rusting, Chicago, Illinois 2.8 110. Huntington County, Pennsylvania Jacobs Timber Bridge over Greater Trough Creek 0.35 111. Chicago, Illinois Landscaping, resurfacing, repair and replacement of curbs and gutters, bridge deeming and repair of lights and redesigning and installation of new signs historic 28 mile Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 5.4 112. Cadillac, Michigan Improvements to highway U.S. 131, north of Cadillac 4.2 113. Durham County, North Carolina Accelerated construction of a four-lane divided freeway on Route 147 38.3 114. Corpus Christi to Angleton, Texas Construct new multi-lane freeway 41.7 115. Fort Worth, Texas Construction of an overpass and frontage road at the Fort Worth Hillwood/I–35 interchange 12.7 116. West Sacramento, California Construction of Industrial Boulevard Bridge over Sacramento River Barge Canal in West Sacramento, California 8.3 117. Baltimore County, Maryland I–695 Improvements in Baltimore County, Maryland 23.9 118. Hampton Roads, Virginia I–64 Crossing of Hampton Roads 5.9 119. Calumet City, Illinois Reconstruction of 156th Street and 156th Place from Burkham Avenue to State line 1.3 105 STAT. 2054 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 120. Frankfort Township, Illinois Improvements of streets in Frankfort Township 1.0 121. 1Matteson, Illinois I–57 Bridge Improvements 3.6 122. Illinois Road Improvement, U.S. 150/Ill. 1 from Belguim to South of Westville 3.8 123. Illinois Road Improvement, U.S. 45 from Savoy to Tolono 5.6 124. Alabama Patton Island Bridge Project 4.7 125. Borough of Paulsboro, New Jersey Construction of a new bridge to improve safety 2.7 126. Minnesota Completion of Cross-Range Expressway (Trunk Highway 169) 13.0 127. Hinckley, Minnesota Safety and capacity improvements to Trunk Highway 48 and relocation of County Road 134 2.0 128. Minnesota Trunk Highway 53, Twig to Trunk Highway 37 9.5 129. Minnesota Trunk Highway 169, Grand Rapids to High City 9.0 130. Minnesota Trunk Highway 61, Schroeder to Grand Marais 18.0 131. Wisconsin Improvements to Highway 41, Oshkosh to Green Bay 41.7 132. Wisconsin Improvements to Highway 29, Chippewa Falls to State Trunk Hwy. 73 28.3 133. Minnesota Trunk Highway 37 and Hughes Rd 0.5 134. Pennsylvania Route 120 widening in vicinity of Lock Haven 4.0 135. Pennsylvania Replace U.S. 15 bridge across Tioga River 3.2 136. Pennsylvania Wysox Narrows Rd (U.S. 6) 3.0 137. Chicago, Illinois Improvements on Kennedy Expressway, except that the allocation percentages under this section shall not apply to this project and, in lieu thereof, 1/3 of the funds for such projects shall be available for obligation in each of fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1994 175 138. South Carolina Southern Connector Highway improvements in Greenville County; Highway 17 Bridge Replacement Projects over Cooper River, Charleston; Carolina Bays Parkway improvements, Myrtle Beach (funds to be equitably divided among these facilities) 11.0 139. South Carolina Rail Corridor Revitalization in Columbia, South Carolina 4.0 140. Rhode Island For design and construction of a stormdrain retrofit on I–95 and other highway runoff programs to protect Narragansett Bay 13.0 141. South Kingstown, Rhode Island For historic renovation and development of an intermodal center at the Kingston Railroad Station 2.0 105 STAT. 2055 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 142. Lincoln and Cumberland, Rhode Island For historic rehabilitation of the Albion Bridge and Albion Trench Bridge 2.0 143. Newport, Rhode Island To develop the marine mode of the intermodal Gateway Transportation Center 6.0 144. Bristol, Rhode Island For road improvements in Bristol, Rhode Island 2.0 145. Pennsylvania An applied technology demonstration in advanced technology demonstrations in advanced driver information systems, with a special emphasis on display instrumentation and information communications technology, to be carried out in cooperation with the Center for Advanced Design and Communication Arts Technology at the University of the Arts 2.0 146. Vermont Construction of a highway from U.S. 7, North of Bennington, Vermont southwest to NY 7 in Hoosick, NY 20 147. Woonsocket, Rhode Island For construction of Route 99 Extension 1.96 148. Woonsocket, Rhode Islsmd For repaving streets in Woonsocket 1.4 149. Woonsocket, Rhode Island For improvements to 3 bridges crossing the Blackstone River 0.35 150. Cranston, Rhode Island For reconstruction and repaving of Park Avenue, Sockanossett Crossroads, Olney Arnold Road, South Comstock Parkway, Wildflower Drive, Aqueduct Road and Mapleton Street 5.7 151. Rhode Island For operating expenses of the Rhode Island Public Transit Authority 18.0 152. New Hampshire To study corridor protection for New Hampshire Route 16 2.0 153. North Conway, New Hampshire To provide congestion relief on U.S. 302 and New Hampshire Route 16 6.3 154. Kansas To widen U.S. 81 7–15 miles Belleville to Concordia 7.0 155. Kansas To construct Hutchinson Bypass between U.S. 50 and K–96 Hutchinson, Kansas 24.4 156. Wyoming For reconstruction of county roads not on the State Highway System by the Wyoming State Department of Transportation 20.0 157. Virginia For the rehabilitation, renovation. reconstruction, resurfacing, safety improvements and modernization on the existing 1,069 mile Interstate system in Virginia to be distributed by the Commonwealth Transportation Board, to the maximum extent possible, on an equitable regional basis 63.5 105 STAT. 2056 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 158. Minnesota Hennepin County, Minnesota Bloomington Ferry Bridge/C.S.A.H. 18 Replacement Project Bloomington, M N 18.0 159. Minnesota Nicollet County, Minnesota C.S.A.H. 41 for roadway stabilization and rockfall control North Mankato, MN 3.0 160. Minnesota St. Cloud, Minnesota T.H. 15 bridge across Mississippi River and Interchange with T.H. 10 3.24 161. Minnesota Minnesota Safety Initiative Program ($2 million to demonstrate the safety benefits of retoreflective pavement markings and signs, especially for nighttime and older drivers; $1 million to demonstrate the safety and environmental benefits of elastomer modified asphalt in cold weather climates) 3.0 162. New York, New York Hell Gate Viaduct: upgrade, repair & paint 55.0 163. New York, New York Ferry Landing, Battery Park: Reconstruction of ferry landing within Battery Park 2.0 164. New York, New York Foley Square Plaza: Transportation improvements & construction activities for Foley Square Plaza development 5.25 165. New York, NY Franklin Delano Roosevelt Drive: To reconstruct & improve several sections of Franklin Delano Roosevelt Drive 10.0 166. Corning, NY Corning Bypass Improvements 11.0 167. Nelson County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing: from U.S. Highway 2 at Michigan southerly to ND Highway 15 at McVille; and of FAS 3220 from ND 1 to ND 32 8.5 168. Stutsman County, North Dakota Surfacing from I–94 north & east through Spiritwood, then north to ND Highway 9 4.0 169. Stelle/Griggs County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 4612 & FAS 2012 from ND 32 to ND 45 2.9 170. Grand Forks County, North Dakota Surfacing of FAS 1822 from FAS 1833 to I–29, & FAS 1812 from FAS 1833 to I–29, & FAS 1833 from FAS 1824 to ND 15 2.6 171. Richland County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing from Wahpeton to the Froedtert Malting Plant 0.6 172. Ward/McHenry County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing FAS 5158 & FAS 2546 from U.S. 83 to ND 41 4.5 173. Bottineau County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing from Bottineau to ND Highway 43 2.4 105 STAT. 2057 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 174. McKenzie County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 2750 from U.S. 85 west 12 miles 2.3 175. Wells County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 5215 from FAS 5208 north to the county line, & from U.S. 52, one mile west of Manfred, north to FAS 5208 2.5 176. Traill County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 4916 from ND 200 east to the Red River 2.8 177. Eddy County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of: FAS 1404 from U.S. 281 east 10.5 miles & from ND 20 west 5.5 miles; & of FAS 1427 from ND 20 south about 8 miles 2.5 178. Renville/Ward County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing, starting at FAS 3809 on the Ward County line south 4 miles & then east 2 miles 0.9 179. Morton County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 3020 from ND 49 southeasterly to FAS 3033 3.1 180. Walsh County, North Dakota Surfacing of FAS 5017 from Lankin south to the Nelson County line & FAS 5022 from Fordville east to ND 18 2.5 181. Dickey County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 1112 from U.S. 281 east to FAS 1127, FAS 1111 from ND 11 south to FAS 1124, & FAS 1137 from ND 11 north to Guelph 4.0 182. Burke County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 0717 from Lignite south to ND 50 4.4 183. Morton County, North Dakota For a bypass from ND 1806 around the westside of Fort Lincoln State Park 3.2 184. Rolette County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing from U.S. 281 around the access loop road in the Int’l. Peace Gardens 1.9 185. Oliver County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing of FAS 3331 from ND 200A at Hensler southerly to ND 25, & FAS 3304 from FAS 3331 east to FAS 3339 2.9 186. Williams County, North Dakota Grading & surfacing at County Rd. 5 from U.S. 2 southerly to ND 1804 2.5 105 STAT. 2058 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 187. Plummer, Idaho Reconstruct a total of 2.9 miles of SH–5 (FAP–14) beginning at M.P. 0.5 in the City of Plummer in Benewah County to M.P. 1.1, and two additional segments located on Peedee Hill from approximately M.P. 3.6 to M.P. 4.9 and M.P. 5.7 to M.P. 6.7 3.6 188. Lemhi County, Idaho Reconstruct an 8.3 mile section of U.S. 93 (FAP–35) in Lemhi County at the Idaho/Montana border. 23 U.S.C. 120(a) shall be applicable to the Federal share payable of the cost of such project 25.6 189. St. Maries, Idaho Rehabilitate existing pavement structure for a total of 14.2 miles of Idaho Forest Highway 50, the St. Joe River Road between St. Maries and the Benewah/Shoshone County Line 3.4 190. Lewiston, Idaho Construct a new road for a total of 2.4 miles along FAU Route 7344, M.P. 0.0–2.4, in Bryden Canyon, Lewiston 3.9 191. Bear Lake County, Idaho Reconstruct a 13.0 mile segment of U.S.–89 (FAP–53) between the communities of Montpelier and Geneva 18.5 192. Alabama Improvements to Anniston Eastern Bypass, in the vicinity of U.S. 431 and Alabama State Hwy. 21 north of Anniston to the Golden Springs interchange on I–20 11.0 193. Coming, New York Additional funding for Corning Bypass (Route 1), except any excess funds from the $13.4 million in total funding for this project shall be available for construction of two additional expressway lanes from Chautauqua Lake Bridge to Pennsylvania border on Route 17 2.4 194. Billings, Montana Construction of the Shilo I–90 Interchange 11.0 195. Missoula, Montana Construction of the Missoula Airport I–90 Interchange 7.0 196. Orlando, Florida Land & right-of-way acquisition & guideway construction for magnetic limitation project 97.5 197. Toledo, Ohio Design & initial construction of a new I–280 Maumee River crossing to replace the Craig Memorial Bridge 37.0 198. New London-Groton/Bridgeport/New Haven, Connecticut Rehabilitate or replace: The Gold Star Bridge over the Thames River I–95 between New London & Groton; the Bridge over the Yellow Mill Channel (Bridgeport); & the Tomlinson Bridge on Rte. 1 over the Quinnipiac River (New Haven) 62.0 105 STAT. 2059 CITY/STATE INNOVATIVE PROJECTS AMOUNT in millions 199. Raleigh/Rocky Mount/Elizabeth City, North Carolina Design & Construction of interstate standard highway from Rocky Mount, NC to Elizabeth City, NC, & for the upgrading of I–64 from Raleigh, NC to Rocky Mount, NC, & Rte. 17 from Elizabeth City to Norfolk. A substantial portion of the funding should be used for the Rocky Mount to Elizabeth segment 30.0 200. Binghamton, New York A study of the feasibility of rehabilitation of the South Washington Street Bridge in Binghamton, NY, to identify plans & specifications for repair if feasible 0.5 201. District of Columbia Advanced composite bridge deck demonstration at Catholic University 0.2 202. Georgia For any highway improvement projects eligibile for funding under title 23, United States Code 27.0 203. Hawaii For any highway improvement projects eligibile for funding under title 23, United States Code 6.0 204. Oklahoma For any highway improvement projects eligibile for funding under title 23, United States Code 59.0 (c) Allocation Percentages.— 8 percent of the amount allocated by subsection (b) for each project authorized by subsection (b) shall be available for obligation in fiscal year 1992. 18.4 percent of such amount shall be available for obligation in each of fiscal years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. (d) Federal Share.— The Federal share payable on account of any project under this section shall be 80 percent of the cost thereof. (e) Delegation to States.— Subject to the provisions of title 23, United States Code, the Secretary shall delegate responsibility for construction of a project or projects under this section to the State in which such project or projects are located upon request of such State. (f) Advance Construction.— When a State which has been delegated responsibility for construction of a project under this section— (1) has obligated all funds allocated under this section for construction of such project; and (2) proceeds to construct such project without the aid of Federal funds in accordance with all procedures and all requirements applicable to such project, except insofar as such procedures and requirements limit the State to the construction of projects with the aid of Federal funds previously allocated to it; the Secretary, upon the approval of the application of a State, shall pay to the State the Federal share of the cost of construction of the project when additional funds are allocated for such project under this section. 105 STAT. 2060 (g) Reports.— Not later than 1 year after completion of a project under this section, the State in which such project is located shall submit to the Secretary a report on the innovative techniques used in carrying out such project and on the results obtained through the use of such techniques. (h) Applicability of Title 23.— Funds authorized by this section shall be available for obligation in the same manner as if such funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, except that the Federal share of the cost of any project under this section shall be determined in accordance with this section and such funds shall remain available until expended. Funds authorized by this section shall not be subject to any obligation limitation.