1906-1908 Ind. Op. Att'y Gen. p. 229
Whether the Labor Commissioner must be domiciled in Indianapolis.
practiced it for three years in Indiana, is one of fact for your
determination.
A person might practice optometry within the meaning of
this act and yet sell spectacles from house to house and from town
to town, provided he was doing the things described in section
four of the act, a question of fact for you to determine.
I think the legislature intended by the proviso to section 4
that one who had been traveling about fitting and peddling spec-
tacles, e.,
and who had not been employing mechanical means
for testing and measuring the refractive and accommodative con-
ditions of the eye, etc., should not be entitled to registration
without examination; that body was not seeking to deprive men
from peddling glasses, but rather to protect the public against
incompetent opticians, and if a person who had been fitting and
peddling spectacles, and at the same time was practicing op-
tometry as. defined in section 4, and had continued to do so for
three years in Indiana, such a person notwithstanding he had
fitted and peddled, would be entitled to registration without ex-
amination.
LABOR COMMISSIONER-RESIDENCE
AND TRAVELING
EXPENSES.
June 26, 1907.
Hon. G. W. Purcell, Labor Commissioner, State House, City:
Dear Sir-Answering your recent favor requiring my opinion
as to whether it is necessary, under the law, to make your home
in Indianapolis, and as to whether the law entitles you to your
expenses while attending to your official duties in Indianapolis
while living in Terre Haute, I beg to advise you:
It is my opinion that so long as you hold the office of labor
commissioner your official domicile will be in the city of Indianap-
olis, regardless of Where you actually live; that you may live
any where in the state so long as you can satisfactorily attend to
your duties, and that, under the statute, you would be entitled
to your traveling expenses in traveling to and from Indianapolis.
I am, therefore, of the opinion that the law does not entitle
you to any expenses while attending to your official duties at the
seat of government.