00-0121
Summary Information Not Available
Cite as La. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 00-0121
April 24, 2000
OPINION #00-121
Ms. Carolyn Robicheaux
Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology
11622 Sunbelt Court
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Dear Ms. Robicheaux:
We restate the facts as presented in your opinion request. An esthetician student,
originally enrolled in cosmetology school in Louisiana, withdrew from the Louisiana
school and ultimately obtained licensure as an esthetician in the State of Florida. The
student has returned to Louisiana and applied for licensure from the Louisiana State
Board of Cosmetology based upon reciprocity. You inquire whether the Board is now
required to issue the license.
The statutory provisions governing licensure for cosmetologists and estheticians are
provided by R.S. 37:502 and R.S. 37:502.1. With respect to the issue of reciprocity,
these statutes provide:
§ 502. Qualifications for certificate as a registered cosmetologist
* * * * *
B. The board shall accept a license or registration of any out-of-state
cosmetologist as registration in this state provided that the out-of-state
cosmetologist submits the original current license or registration to the
board for reviewing along with fees required by R.S. 37:516.
* * * * *
§ 502.1 Qualifications for certification as a registered esthetician
A. A person is qualified to receive a certificate of registration as a
registered esthetician who:
(1) Is at least sixteen years of age.
63-A
Licensing for professions
Reciprocal licensure is available for those cosmetologists and
estheticians who are licensed out-of-state, but is nonexistent with
respect to manicurists and cosmetology teachers who are licensed
out-of-state, and board rule purporting to create reciprocity for
manicurists and cosmetology teachers fails for lacking statutory
authority.
Ms. Carolyn Robicheaux
OPINION 00-121
Page 2
(2) Is of good moral character and temperate habit.
* * * * *
B. Any person who is an esthetician registered or licensed under the laws
of another state or territory of the United States or of a foreign country or
province may be granted a certificate of registration as a registered
esthetician by the board without an examination, upon payment of a fee,
provided that he fulfill the requirements of Paragraphs (1) and (2) of
Subsection A, provided the requirements for registration of license of
estheticians in the state, territory, country, or province from which he
moved shall have been in effect during the year preceding his application,
and the state, territory, country, or province has substantially equal
requirements to those now in force in this state, upon a showing of active
practice of esthetics in the home state, territory, country, or province of the
applicant which was uninterrupted for three or more years prior to his
application, he shall be deemed to have fulfilled this requirement.
With respect to cosmetologists, R.S. 37:502 is unambiguous. An out-of-state applicant
for a Louisiana cosmetology license need only submit his valid registration from another
state in order to be licensed as a cosmetologist in Louisiana, along with the required
fees.
With respect to estheticians, the law is more burdensome to the applicant who has been
licensed in another state. This applicant must show that his home state had in effect
during the year prior to the application substantially equal requirements for licensure as
compared to those requirements now in force in Louisiana. He is exempt from this
requirement only if he has been practicing as an esthetician uninterrupted for three
years prior to his application.
Thus, it is appropriate for the Board to conduct a hearing to determine whether the
applicant referenced in your correspondence has in fact met the requirements of law, as
you indicate that Florida law requires substantially less hours of schoolwork than does
Louisiana law. We refrain from making a factual determination regarding this particular
applicant, as that decision is properly within the jurisdiction and authority of the Board.
See R.S. 37:499(C), wherein the Board is “authorized to make such investigations and
conduct hearings…. as are necessary to supervise the regulatory provisions” of the law.
The Board is also empowered by statute to “adopt and enforce all rules and orders
necessary” to discharge its duties and further is authorized to “perform such other duties
as are necessary to carry out those functions which are relative to policymaking,
rulemaking, licensure, or adjudication.” See R.S. 37:546(A) and R.S. 37:498(G). In
accord with this authority, the board promulgated the following rule:
Ms. Carolyn Robicheaux
OPINION 00-121
Page 3
§ 505 Reciprocity
A. Any person who is licensed as a cosmetologist, esthetician, manicurist
or teacher under the laws of another state or territory of the United States
or under a foreign country shall be entitled to be licensed provided that the
out-of-state operator submits the original current license or registrations to
the board for review along with fees as required by R.S. 37:516.
B. Foreign reciprocity will be handled on its own merit by board action
after proper documentation has been provided by their respective nation.
The documents must be translated into English and notarized. The fee for
this license is $40.
AUTHORITY NOTE: Promulgated in accordance with R.S. 37:502.
HISTORICAL NOTE: Promulgated by the Department of Commerce,
Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology, December 1974, amended by the
Department of Economic Development, Louisiana State Board of
Cosmetology, L.R. 611 (May 1993).
An administrative agency must act in conformity with its statutory authority, which it
cannot exceed. Durham vs. Louisiana State Racing Commission, 449 So.2d 475 (La.
1984). In other jurisdictions, this corollary has been restated as recognizing the
principle that an administrative board “may not by its rules and regulations add to or
detract from the law as enacted”. See State Board of Registration for Professional
Engineers v. Eberenz, 701 N.E.2d 892 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999), at page 896, and citations
therein. Neither may the Board by rule impose additional educational requirements
beyond the requirements prescribed by statute for reciprocal licensing. See Rawson v.
Idaho State Board of Cosmetology, 695 P.2d 422 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985).
There is no reciprocity provision in our state law that allows the Board to accept the
application of a manicurist or cosmetology teacher, licensed out-of-state, who has not
met the requirements of Louisiana state law with respect to licensure. See R.S. 37:507
and R.S. 37:506 concerning qualifications for manicurists and teachers, respectively.
Lacking a reciprocity clause, the Board is without power to promulgate a rule which
would essentially allow an out-of-state applicant to circumvent the mandatory licensure
criteria imposed by state law. Thus, the rule promulgated by the Board is congruent
only with those reciprocity provisions of state law cited hereinabove governing
cosmetologists and estheticians.
Accordingly, we conclude:
1.
Cosmetologists who are licensed out-of-state need only submit their license in
order to be licensed here, without further requirement;
Ms. Carolyn Robicheaux
OPINION 00-121
Page 4
2.
Estheticians may become licensed in this state without examination upon
submission of a certificate of registration and a showing that the certificate was
issued in a jurisdiction which has substantially equal requirements to those now
in force in the state;
3.
Manicurists licensed out-of-state must meet the requirements of state law as no
reciprocity provision exists under current state law, and the Board rule purporting
to create reciprocity is unauthorized;
4.
Cosmetology teachers licensed out-of-state must meet the requirements of state
law as no reciprocity provision exists under current state law, and the Board rule
and the Board rule purporting to create reciprocity is unauthorized.
We hope the foregoing is helpful to you. Should you have further questions, please
contact this office.
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY:
_______________________________
KERRY L. KILPATRICK
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
KLK:ams
Ms. Carolyn Robicheaux
OPINION 00-121
Page 5
OPINION 00-121
63-A Licensing for professions
Reciprocal licensure is available for those cosmetologists and estheticians who are
licensed out-of-state, but is nonexistent with respect to manicurists and cosmetology
teachers who are licensed out-of-state, and board rule purporting to create reciprocity
for manicurists and cosmetology teachers fails for lacking statutory authority.
Ms. Carolyn Robicheaux
Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology
11622 Sunbelt Court
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
Date Received:
Date Released: April 24, 2000
Kerry L. Kilpatrick
Assistant Attorney General