00-0121A
Summary Information Not Available
Cite as La. Att'y Gen. Op. No. 00-0121A
July 7, 2000
OPINION 00-121 A
Mr. John Jay, Chairman
Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology
11622 Sunbelt Court
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809
Dear Mr. Jay:
You have submitted for our review proposed new board rules governing the licensure of
manicurists and cosmetology teachers. These proposed guidelines are restated herein
as per your correspondence:
MANICURIST
1. Provide the board with an affidavit of hours earned out-of-state.
2. If the number of hours is comparable to the 500 hours required by
Louisiana, the applicant can be given the Louisiana Written Exam on
the rules and regulations governing the cosmetology industry in
Louisiana, practical exam and National Theory exam. If the applicant
has taken the National Theory exam as approved by National
Interstate Council of Cosmetology Boards, in another state and can
provide proof they passed, then the board will accept the exam score.
3. If the number of hours is less than the statutory required 500 hours, the
applicant can earn the additional hours by attending school anywhere
or transfer the hours to a Louisiana School and complete the hours in
Louisiana. The applicant can be given the Louisiana Written Exam on
the rules and regulations governing the cosmetology industry in
Louisiana, practical exam and National Theory exam. If the applicant
has taken the National Theory exam as approved by National
Interstate Council of Cosmetology Boards, in another state and can
provide proof they passed, then the board will accept the exam score.
4. After passing the exams, a Louisiana manicuring license will be issued.
63-A
Licensing for professions
R.S. 37:506; R.S. 37:507
Reviews proposed Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology rules
regarding licensure of manicurists and cosmetology teachers.
Mr. John Jay
OPINION 00-121A
Page 2
TEACHER
1. Provide the board with an affidavit of hours earned out-of-state.
2. If the number of hours is comparable to the 500 hours required by
Louisiana, the applicant can be given the Louisiana Written Exam on
the rules and regulations governing the cosmetology industry in
Louisiana, a practical exam and the National Theory exam. If the
applicant has taken the National Theory exam as approved by National
Interstate Council of Cosmetology Boards, in another state and can
provide proof they passed, then the board will accept the National
Exam score.
3. If the number of hours is less than the statutory required 500 hours, the
applicant can earn the additional hours by attending school anywhere
or transfer the hours to a Louisiana School and complete the hours in
Louisiana. The applicant can be given the Louisiana Written Exam on
the rules and regulations governing the cosmetology industry in
Louisiana, practical exam and National Theory exam. If the applicant
has taken the National Theory exam as approved by National
Interstate Council of Cosmetology Boards, in another state and can
provide proof they passed, then the board will accept the exam score.
4. After passing the exams, a Louisiana teacher (instructor) license will
be issued.
As we stated in Attorney General Opinion 00-121, the Board is without authority to
promulgate a rule which allows any applicant to circumvent the mandatory licensure
requirements of the law. Those requirements are set forth in R.S. 37:507 and R.S.
37:506, governing manicurists and teachers, respectively, as follows:
§ 507. Qualification for certificate as registered manicurist.
Any person is qualified to receive a certificate of registration as a
registered manicurist who:
1. Is at least sixteen years of age;
2. Is of good moral character and temperate habits;
3. Has taken a course at a school of cosmetic therapy as prescribed by
the board, which course shall extend over a period of not less than
three consecutive months and shall include not less than five hundred
hours of study;
4. Has successfully passed an examination, which shall be prescribed by
the board. (Emphasis added).
Mr. John Jay
OPINION 00-121A
Page 3
All privileges of this certificate are included in the cosmetologist’s
certificate of registration.
* * * * *
§ 506. License as teacher
A. No person shall teach cosmetology, esthetics, or allied courses without
a certificate. Any operator is eligible for licensing as a teacher who
possesses the following qualifications:
(1) Is a graduate of an approved senior high school.
(2) Has completed the curriculum for the teacher’s training course under
the supervision of a licensed teacher of beauty culture for a minimum
study of five hundred hours in not less than three months.
(3) Has passed such examination, as the board shall prescribe for
certifications as a teacher.
B. The board may license a person as an instructor in esthetics who has
practiced esthetics for at least five years or has taught esthetics for at
least eighteen months on the effective date of this Section, and who
can present proof of training, experience, or both, to the board for
review to determine whether or not the applicant must be examined by
the board, if said applicant fulfills the requirements of Paragraphs (1)
and (2) of Subsection A of Section 502.1 and is a graduate of an
approved senior high school. (Emphasis added).
Turning first to the proposed rules governing manicurists, we find the third guideline to
be in conflict with that portion of R.S. 37:507(3) which requires the applicant to have
taken “a course at a school of cosmetic therapy as prescribed by the board, which
course shall extend over a period of not less than three consecutive months, and shall
include not less than five hundred hours of study.” The board rule acknowledges a
scenario where an applicant has “less than the statutory [sic] required 500 hours”, but
fails to acknowledge the statutory requirement that the coursework of 500 hours shall be
completed within a three month time period. According to our legal rules of statutory
construction, use of the word “shall” is mandatory.1 Thus, the legislature has imposed a
stringent two-fold requirement that the applicant have attended a school (1) for a period
of not less than three consecutive months, which course shall include (2) not less than
1 R.S. 1:3 provides:
§ 3. Words and phrases; how construed
Words and phrases shall be read with their context and shall be construed according to the common and
approved usage of the language. Technical words and phrases, and such others as may have acquired a
peculiar and appropriate meaning in the law, shall be construed and understood according to such
peculiar and appropriate meaning. The word “shall” is mandatory and the word “may” is permissive.
Mr. John Jay
OPINION 00-121A
Page 4
five hundred hours. We acknowledge that the Board has the discretion to find the
school to be accredited, (hence the language in R.S. 37:507(3) “school of cosmetic
therapy as prescribed by the board”); further, the Board, as the administrative agency
compelled to discharge the licensure law here under review, is accorded our deference
with respect to how an applicant might combine his 500 hours earned at such
institution(s) considered accredited by the Board.
These determinations regarding particular applicants currently under consideration by
the Board are squarely within the authority of the Board and will not be addressed by
this office. It is solely our intention to review proposed Board rules for conflicts with
statutory requirements. As the Board is aware, legislative action is the appropriate
remedy to accomplish the goals of the Board regarding future changes in the licensure
law.
Similarly, the legislature has mandated in R.S. 37:506 that an applicant for the teacher’s
license be trained (a) by a licensed teacher of beauty culture (b) for a minimum of five
hundred hours (c) in not less than three months. Here again, the Board rule does not
acknowledge that the 500 hours of study, wherever earned, must be accomplished
within a three-month time period, hence the phrase “not less than three months” as
reflected in the statute.2 Other than the foregoing stated concerns, we find no conflict
between the proposed Board rules and the current statutes.
As an aside, there has been some confusion over whether the Board might not in
essence be issuing “reciprocal” licenses to those applicants who have attended school
out-of-state, which we said cannot be done in Attorney General Opinion 00-121. In
general, reciprocal licensure in occupations and professions contemplates that one who
is already licensed under the terms and conditions of a particular occupation in one
state may immediately be considered for licensure in another state upon the payment of
a fee or upon the successful completion of an examination, without further schoolwork.
Here, with regard to manicurists and teachers, the legislature has yet to enact such
reciprocal arrangements. This fact does not invalidate the coursework accomplished
by an applicant simply because the school attended by the applicant was out-of-state;
and in contrast, neither is the Board compelled to immediately accept 500 hours of
coursework completed at a school out-of-state. Thus, under current law, the Board
retains the discretion to find an applicant’s coursework lacking for failing to meet the
requirements of Louisiana law as provided in R.S. 37:506 and R.S. 37:507, if the Board
considers the school to be unacceptable.
2 We acknowledge the exception made for an instructor in esthetics provided for in R.S. 37:506(B).
Mr. John Jay
OPINION 00-121A
Page 5
Should you have other questions in which we may provide assistance, please contact
this office.
Very truly yours,
RICHARD P. IEYOUB
ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY:
________________________________
KERRY L. KILPATRICK
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
KLK:ams
Mr. John Jay
OPINION 00-121A
Page 6
OPINION 00-121A
63-A Licensing for professions
R.S. 37:506; R.S. 37:507
Reviews proposed Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology rules regarding licensure of
manicurists and cosmetology teachers.
Mr. John Jay, Chairman
Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology
11622 Sunbelt Court
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70809
Date Received:
Date Released: July 7, 2000
Kerry L. Kilpatrick
Assistant Attorney General