Strategic Plan

(1) Alternative Election. The Commissioner will assess an institution's record of helping to meet the credit needs of its assessment area(s) under a strategic plan if: (a) the institution has submitted the plan to the Commissioner as provided for in 209 CMR 46.27; (b) the Commissioner has approved the plan; (c) the plan is in effect; and (d) the institution has been operating under an approved plan for at least one year. (2) Data Reporting. The Commissioner's approval of a plan does not affect the institution's obligation, if any, to report data as required by 209 CMR 46.42. (3) Plans in General. (a) Term. A plan may have a term of no more than five years, and any multi-year plan must include annual interim measurable goals under which the Commissioner will evaluate the institution's performance. (b) Multiple Assessment Areas. An institution with more than one assessment area may prepare a single plan for all of its assessment areas or one or more plans for one or more of its assessment areas. (c) Treatment of Affiliates. Affiliated institutions may prepare a joint plan if the plan provides measurable goals for each institution. Activities may be allocated among institutions at the institutions' option, provided that the same activities are not considered for more than one institution. (4) Public Participation in Plan Development. Before submitting a plan to the Commissioner for approval, an institution shall: (a) informally seek suggestions from members of the public in its assessment area(s) covered by the plan while developing the plan; (b) once the institution has developed a plan, formally solicit public comment on the plan for at least 30 days by publishing notice in at least one newspaper of general circulation in each assessment area covered by the plan; and (c) during the period of formal public comment, make copies of the plan available for review by the public at no cost at all offices of the institution in any assessment area covered by the plan and provide copies of the plan upon request for a reasonable fee to cover copying and mailing, if applicable. (5) Submission of Plan. The institution shall submit its plan to the Commissioner at least three months prior to the proposed effective date of the plan. The institution shall also submit with its plan a description of its informal efforts to seek suggestions from members of the public, any written public comment received, and, if the plan was revised in light of the comment received, the initial plan as released for public comment. (6) Plan Content. (a) Measurable Goals. 1. An institution shall specify in its plan measurable goals for helping to meet the credit needs of each assessment area covered by the plan, particularly the needs of low- and moderate-income geographies and low- and moderate-income individuals, through lending, investment, and services, as appropriate. 2. An institution shall address in its plan all three performance categories and, unless the institution has been designated as a wholesale or limited purpose institution, shall emphasize lending and lending-related activities. Nevertheless, a different emphasis, including a focus on one or more performance categories, may be appropriate if responsive to the characteristics and credit needs of its assessment area(s), considering public comment and the institution's capacity and constraints, product offerings, and business strategy. (b) Confidential Information. An institution may submit additional information to the Commissioner on a confidential basis which shall not be deemed a public record as defined in M.G.L. c. 4, § 7 or be subject to the public disclosure provisions of M.G.L. c. 66, § 10, but the goals stated in the plan must be sufficiently specific to enable the public and the Commissioner to judge the merits of the plan. (c) Satisfactory and Outstanding Goals. An institution shall specify in its plan measurable goals that constitute "satisfactory" performance. A plan may specify measurable goals that constitute "outstanding" performance. If an institution submits, and the Commissioner approves, both "satisfactory" and "outstanding" performance goals, the Commissioner will consider the institution eligible for an "outstanding" performance rating. (d) Election if Satisfactory Goals not Substantially Met. An institution may elect in its plan that, if the institution fails to meet substantially its plan goals for a satisfactory rating, the Commissioner will evaluate the institution's performance under the lending, investment, and service tests, the community development test, or the small institution performance standards, as appropriate. (7) Plan Approval. (a) Timing. The Commissioner will act upon a plan within 60 calendar days after the Commissioner receives the complete plan and other material required under 209 CMR 46.27(5) and (6). If the Commissioner fails to act within this time period, the plan shall be deemed approved unless the Commissioner extends the review period for good cause. (b) Public Participation. In evaluating the plan's goals, the Commissioner considers the public's involvement in formulating the plan, written public comment on the plan, and any response by the institution to public comment on the plan. (c) Criteria for Evaluating Plan. The Commissioner evaluates a plan's measurable goals using the following criteria, as appropriate: 1. the extent and breadth of lending or lending-related activities, including, as appropriate, the distribution of loans among different geographies, businesses and farms of different sizes, and individuals of different income levels, the extent of community development lending, and the use of innovative or flexible lending practices to address credit needs; 2. the amount and innovativeness, complexity, and responsiveness of the institution's qualified investments; and 3. the availability and effectiveness of the institution's systems for delivering retail banking services and the extent and innovativeness of the institution's community development services. (8) Plan Amendment. During the term of a plan, an institution may request the Commissioner to approve an amendment to the plan on grounds that there has been a material change in circumstances. The institution shall develop an amendment to a previously approved plan in accordance with the public participation requirements of 209 CMR 46.27(4). (9) Plan Assessment. The Commissioner approves the goals and assesses performance under a plan as provided for in 209 CMR 46.61 (Ratings).