78OAG356
78OAG356
Cite as 78 Md. Op. Att'y Gen. 356
356
The expenses of “grass-roots” lobbying have been, and remain,
1
nondeductible. 26 U.S.C. §162(e)(1)(c).
TAXATION ) INCOME TAX ) CORPORATE LOBBYING EXPENSES
ARE NO LONGER DEDUCTIBLE
December 22, 1993
Honorable Mary Louise Preis
House of Delegates
You have requested our opinion whether a change in federal
income tax law limiting the deduction of corporate lobbying
expenses affects the deductibility of such expenses under Maryland’s
corporate income tax law.
For the reasons stated below, we conclude that, to precisely the
same extent as federal law will disallow the deduction of corporate
lobbying expenses starting January 1, 1994, so State law will
effectively disallow the deduction of such expenses for purposes of
the State corporate income tax.
I
Federal Tax Law Change
The Budget Reconciliation Act urged by President Clinton and
passed by Congress on August 10, 1993, contained a number of
revenue-raising provisions. One of these, §13222 of the Act, will
deny corporate taxpayers a federal income tax deduction for certain
lobbying expenses. Pub. L. No. 103-66, 107 Stat. 477.
Under the law applicable to the 1993 tax year, expenses
incurred in “direct” lobbying – that is, involvement with legislative
bodies, as distinct from “grass roots” lobbying – are deductible as
ordinary and necessary business expenses. Effective January 1,
1
1994, Congress has disallowed the deduction “for any amount paid
or incurred in connection with ... influencing legislation ....” 26
U.S.C. §162(e)(1)(A). The term “influencing legislation” is broadly
357
The disallowance extends as well to expenses incurred in lobbying
2
senior officials of the executive branch of the federal government.
§162(e)(1)(D).
There is also an exception for in-house expenditures not in excess
3
of $2,000. §162(e)(5)(B).
defined to mean “any attempt to influence any legislation through
communication with any member or employee of a legislative body,
or with any government official or employee who may participate in
the formulation of legislation.” §162(e)(4)(A). Moreover, if a
2
corporation pays dues to a tax-exempt organization that uses a
portion of the dues to influence legislation, then the pro rata portion
of those dues is also not deductible. §162(e)(3). The one major
exception is for expenses in connection with lobbying on “legislation
of any local council or similar governing body ... with respect to
legislation of direct interests to the taxpayer ....” §162(e)(2).
3
In its report, the House Ways and Means Committee stated
that, “in the context of deficit reduction legislation, it is appropriate
to limit the business deduction for lobbying expenses.” H.R. Rep.
No. 103-111, 103rd Cong., 1st Sess. at 659, reprinted in 1993 U.S.
Code Cong. and Admin. News 890. The legislative history makes
clear that the disallowance rule applies to attempts to influence state
legislation. Id.
II
State Corporate Tax Law
“Maryland income tax laws were written with both eyes on the
federal tax laws.” Comptroller v. Chesapeake Corp., 54 Md. App.
208, 218, 458 A.2d 459, cert. denied, 296 Md. 653 (1983) (internal
quotation omitted). Subject to certain allocation rules for
corporations that conduct business both in Maryland and other states
and to certain modifications that are not pertinent to this issue, the
Maryland taxable income of a corporation is “the corporation’s
federal taxable income for the taxable year as determined under the
Internal Revenue Code ....” §§10-301 and 10-304(1) of the Tax-
General Article, Maryland Code. The incorporation by reference of
the Internal Revenue Code includes any amendments to the Code:
“Whenever a provision of the public general ... laws of this State
358
The Board of Revenue Estimates, in fact, has included the increase
4
in corporate taxes resulting from the federal disallowance in estimating
next year’s tax revenues.
refers to any portion of this Code, or to any other law, the reference
applies to any subsequent amendment to that portion of the Code or
other law, unless the referring provisions expressly provides
otherwise.” Article 1, §21 of the Maryland Code.
A corporation’s federal taxable income is determined after the
corporation takes whatever deductions are allowed by federal law.
See 26 U.S.C. §63(a). Hence, when a corporate taxpayer calculates
its federal taxable income for the 1994 tax year, the disallowance of
lobbying expenses contained in the federal Budget Reconciliation
Act will result in a higher federal taxable income than would have
been the case under former law. That same higher federal taxable
income will also be used for calculating the Maryland corporate
income tax. Therefore, the disallowance of lobbying expenses for
federal corporate income tax purposes effects an identical
disallowance for the Maryland corporate income tax.
4
III
Conclusion
It is our opinion that, as a result of a disallowance of lobbying
expenses as a deduction under federal income tax law, lobbying
expenses generally will no longer result in a reduction of a
corporation’s Maryland corporate income tax liability.
J. Joseph Curran, Jr.
Attorney General
Jack Schwartz
Chief Counsel
Opinions & Advice