10 CSR 10-5.510
Control of Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides
PURPOSE: The purpose of this regulation is
to reduce the emissions of nitrogen oxides in
the St. Louis ozone nonattainment area. This
regulation requires major sources of Nitrogen
Oxides (NOX ) to install or comply with reasonably available control technology (RACT)
as required under the Clean Air Act.
(1) Applicability.
(A) This rule shall apply to all installations
located in the counties of Franklin, Jefferson,
St. Charles and St. Louis and the City of St.
Louis with the potential to emit one hundred
(100) tons or greater per year of nitrogen
oxides.
(B) Installations affected by this rule shall
be in compliance no later than May 1, 2002.
The director may grant an extension of the
compliance deadline if the affected installation submits an alternative compliance plan
no later than January 1, 2001. The alternative
compliance plan shall include the following
items:
1. For each affected unit, a detailed
analysis of the air quality benefit that will
occur if the compliance date is extended;
2. For each affected unit, a detailed
explanation of the reasons why the owner or
operator believes that compliance with the
applicable NOx emissions limit by May 1,
2002 is impractical;
3. Information sufficient to identify each
affected unit;
4. A proposed schedule setting dates by
which the owner or operator will complete
the following milestones for each affected
unit:
A. Applications for all necessary permits;
B. Contracts for the implementation
of new units or control equipment;
C. Construction and installation of
new units or control equipment; and
D. Compliance with the applicable
NOx emissions limitation established in this
rule; and
5. Any other information the director
requests.
(C) Exemptions. The requirements of this
rule shall not apply to the following emission
units:
1. Any boiler having a maximum heat
input of less than fifty (50) million British
thermal units (mmBtu) per hour;
2. Any stationary internal combustion
engine having a rated energy output capacity
of less than five hundred (500) horsepower or
a maximum heat input capacity of twenty
(20) mmBtu per hour or less;
3. Any stationary combustion turbine
having a rated maximum heat input capacity
of less than twenty (20) mmBtu per hour;
4. Any emergency standby boiler, stationary internal combustion engine, stationary combustion turbine, start up unit, or
black start unit which operates less than
seven hundred and fifty (750) hours annually
and less than four hundred (400) hours during
ozone season;
5. Any research and development emissions unit;
6. Any jet engine test cell;
7. Any air pollution control device;
8. Any emission unit which is required
to meet a more stringent state or federal NOx
emissions limitation;
9. Any unit that would otherwise be
required to comply with this rule with actual
annual NOx emissions of thirty (30) tons per
year or less. This exemption shall cease to
apply to a unit if the unit ever exceeds thirty
(30) tons per year of actual NOx emissions
for any calendar year. Any unit that becomes
affected by this rule due to failure to maintain
this exemption after January 1, 2000 shall
immediately notify the department in writing
that the rule applies. The unit shall be in
compliance with the applicable provisions of
this rule within twenty-four (24) months after
notifying the department or May 1, 2002,
whichever is later;
10. Any unit subject to and in compliance with Phase II acid rain requirements;
and
11. Any incinerator having a maximum
rated heat input capacity of less than fifty
(50) mmBtu per hour.
(2) Definitions.
(A) Black start unit—Any electric generating unit operated only in the event of a complete loss of power.
(B) Cyclone boiler—A boiler with a horizontal, cylindrical furnace that burns crushed
rather than pulverized coal.
(C) Emergency standby boiler—A boiler
operated during times of loss of primary
power at the installation that is beyond the
control of the owner or operator, during routine maintenance, to provide steam for building heat; or to protect essential equipment.
(D) Emergency stationary internal combustion engine—A stationary internal combustion engine used to drive pumps, aerators or
other equipment only during times of loss of
primary power at the facility that is beyond
the control of the owner or operator of the
facility or during routine maintenance.
(E) Emergency stationary combustion turbine—A stationary combustion turbine operated only during times of loss of primary
power at the facility that is beyond the control
of the owner or operator of the facility or during routine maintenance.
(F) Internal combustion engine—Any
engine in which power, produced by heat
and/or pressure developed in the engine
cylinder(s) by burning a mixture of fuel and
air, is subsequently converted to mechanical
work by means of one or more pistons.
(G) Jet engine test cell—A stationary jet
engine used for the purpose of research and
testing.
(H) Predictive emissions monitoring system
(PEMS)—A system that uses process and other
parameters as inputs to a computer program or
other data reduction system to predict values
in terms of the applicable emission limitation
or standard.
(I) Research and development emissions
unit—Any combustion unit operated only for
the purpose of research and development
work.
(J) Start-up unit—A unit operated only to
start up larger electric generating units.
(K)
Stationary
internal
combustion
engine—Any internal combustion engine that
is not self-propelled, but which may be
mounted on a vehicle for portability.
(L) Stoker boiler—A boiler design that
employs a grate assembly to combust coal.
(M) Tangentially fired boiler—A boiler
that has coal and air nozzles mounted in each
Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
corner of the furnace where the vertical furnace walls meet. Both pulverized coal and air
are directed from the furnace corners along a
line tangential to a circle lying in a horizontal
plane of the furnace.
(N) Wall fired boiler—A boiler that has
pulverized coal burners arranged on the wall
of the furnace. The burners have discrete,
individual flames that extend perpendicularly
into the furnace area.
(O) Definitions of certain terms specified
in this rule, other than those specified in this
rule section, may be found in 10 CSR 106.020.
(3) General Provisions.
(A) No owner or operator of a boiler with
a maximum rated heat input capacity of one
hundred (100) mmBtu per hour or greater
shall allow the unit to emit NOx in excess of
the emission rates specified in Table 1 as
measured pursuant to section (5) of this rule.
Table 1
Maximum Allowable NOX Emission Rates
for Boilers
(Pounds of NOX per mmBtu)
(B) An owner or operator of a boiler or
incinerator with a maximum rated heat input
capacity equal to or greater than fifty (50)
mmBtu per hour but less than one hundred
(100) mmBtu per hour shall complete an annual adjustment or tune up on the combustion
process. This adjustment or tune up shall
include at a minimum the following items:
1. Inspection, adjustment, cleaning or
replacement of fuel burning equipment,
including the burners and moving parts necessary for proper operation as specified by
the manufacturer;
2. Inspection of the flame pattern or
characteristics and adjustments necessary to
minimize total emissions of NOX and, to the
extent practicable, minimize emissions of
carbon monoxide; and
3. Inspection of the air to fuel ratio control system and adjustments necessary to
ensure proper calibration and operation as
specified by the manufacturer.
(C) No owner or operator of a stationary
combustion turbine shall allow or permit the
discharge of any NOx emissions in excess of
the following limits:
1. Seventy-five (75) parts per million
(ppm), corrected to fifteen percent (15%)
oxygen, for combustion turbines firing
gaseous fuel only; and
2. One hundred ten (110) ppm, corrected to fifteen percent (15%) oxygen, for combustion turbines firing distillate oil or diesel
fuel.
(D) No owner or operator of a stationary
internal combustion engine with a rated maximum heat input capacity greater than twenty
(20) mmBtu per hour shall allow or permit
the discharge of NOX emissions in excess of
the following limits:
1. For rich burn engines which burn
only gaseous fuels—
A. Nine and one-half (9.5) grams per
horsepower-hour for engines which are rated
equal to or greater than five hundred (500)
horsepower and less than one thousand
(1,000) horsepower; or
B. Two and one-half (2.5) grams per
horsepower-hour for engines which are rated
equal to or greater than one thousand (1,000)
horsepower;
2. For lean burn engines which burn
only gaseous fuels—
A. Ten (10.0) grams per horsepowerhour for engines which are rated equal to or
greater than five hundred (500) horsepower
and less than one thousand (1,000) horsepower; or
B. Three (3.0) grams per horsepowerhour for engines which are rated equal to or
greater than one thousand (1,000) horsepower;
3. For engines which burn only diesel
fuel or distillate oil—
A. Eight and one-half (8.5) grams per
horsepower-hour for engines which are rated
equal to or greater than five hundred (500)
horsepower and less than one thousand eight
hundred (1,800) horsepower; or
B. Two and one-half (2.5) grams per
horsepower-hour for engines which are rated
equal to or greater than one thousand eight
hundred (1,800) horsepower; or
4. For engines which burn dual fuels—
A. Six (6.0) grams per horsepowerhour for engines which are rated equal to or
greater than five hundred (500) horsepower
and less than two thousand (2,000) horsepower; or
B. Two and one-half (2.5) grams per
horsepower-hour for engines which are rated
equal to or greater than two thousand (2,000)
horsepower.
(E) No owner or operator of a regenerative
container glass melting furnace shall allow
the unit to emit NOx in excess of 5.5 pounds
of NOx per ton of glass pulled.
(F) No owner or operator of a portland
cement kiln shall allow the unit to operate
unless good combustion practices are implemented. Each portland cement kiln shall
develop a good combustion practice plan that
identifies appropriate kiln operating parameters necessary to ensure minimum NOx formation. Each kiln operator shall be trained to
operate the kiln in accordance with the plan.
The parameters included in the plan shall
include at a minimum the following:
1. Kiln exit oxygen operating range or a
surrogate parameter;
2. Clinker burning zone temperature
operating range or a surrogate parameter; and
3. Monitoring and record keeping procedures for each parameter.
(G) Emissions Averaging. An owner or
operator may comply with the requirements
of subsections (3)(A), (3)(C), (3)(D), (3)(E)
and (3)(H) of this rule by averaging between
two (2) or more similar emission units provided they are located in the St. Louis ozone
nonattainment area and provided that both
units are required to comply with the subsections (3)(A), (3)(C), (3)(D), (3)(E) or (3)(H)
of this rule.
1. Compliance shall be based on the
weighted average of actual NOx emissions
from the units on a monthly basis. The averaged emissions rate for the units must be
equal to or less than the allowable emissions
rate for the units as defined in this rule. An
owner or operator who elects to comply with
an average NOx emission limit shall use the
following equation to determine compliance:
∑(actual NOx emission rate from each unit *
actual monthly heat input from each unit) ≤
∑(allowable NOx emission rate from each
unit * actual monthly heat input from each
unit)
2. NOx emission rates shall be calculated from actual data from continuous emissions monitoring system (CEMS), PEMS or
established through stack testing at several
loads.
3. NOx emissions averaging may only
occur between emission units operated under
same owner unless a binding legal agreement
between two (2) owners is filed with the
director and provided the emission units are
located in the St. Louis ozone nonattainment
area. The binding legal agreement must specify the following:
A. A commitment between the two
(2) owners or operators to comply with the
averaging provisions;
B. Identification of the emission units
which will be used for averaging;
C. An outline of how the emission
units will comply with the averaging provisions;
)XHO%RLOHU7\SH
)LULQJ&RQILJXUDWLRQV
7DQJHQWLDO
:DOO
&\FORQ
H
6WRNHU
*DVHRXV)XHOV
2QO\
'LVWLOODWH2LO
5HVLGXDO2LO
&RDO±:HW
%RWWRP
&RDO±'U\
%RWWRP
D. A schedule for submitting the
monthly data used to determine compliance
with the averaging provisions; and
E. Contacts from each owner or operator who will be responsible for the monthly
compliance reports.
(H) Case-By-Case RACT Studies.
1. The owner or operator of an emissions unit subject to this rule but not specifically identified in subsection (3)(A), (3)(B),
(3)(C), (3)(D), (3)(E) or (3)(F) of this rule
shall conduct and submit by July 1, 2000 a
detailed engineering and RACT study for
those emission units subject to this rule.
2. Each RACT proposal shall, at a minimum, include the following information:
A. A list of emission units subject to
the RACT requirements;
B. The size or capacity of each affected emission unit and the types of fuel combusted or the types and quantities of materials
processed or produced by each emission unit;
C. A physical description of each
emission unit and its operating characteristics;
D. Estimates of the potential and
actual NOx emissions from each affected
emission unit and associated supporting documentation;
E. A RACT analysis which meets the
requirements of subsection (3)(H) of this
rule, including technical and economic support documentation identified in subsection
(3)(G) of this rule for each affected emission
unit;
F. A schedule for completing implementation of the RACT proposal as expeditiously as practicable but not later than April
1, 2001, including interim dates for the
issuance of purchase orders, start and completion of process technology and control
technology changes and the completion of
compliance testing;
G. Testing, monitoring, record keeping and reporting procedures proposed to
demonstrate compliance with RACT;
H. An application for an operating
permit amendment or application to incorporate the provisions of the RACT proposal;
and
I. Additional information requested
by the department that is necessary for the
evaluation of the RACT proposal.
3. In addition, the RACT analysis shall
include:
A. A ranking of the available control
options for the affected emission unit in
descending order of control effectiveness.
Available control options are air pollution
control technologies or techniques with a reasonable potential for application to the emission unit. Air pollution control technologies
and techniques include the application of production process or methods and control systems for NOx. The control technologies and
techniques shall include existing controls for
the source category and technology transfer
controls applied to similar source categories;
B. An evaluation of the technical feasibility of the available control options as
required by paragraph (3)(G)1. of this rule.
The evaluation of technical feasibility shall be
based on physical, chemical and engineering
principles. If an analysis is determined to be
technically infeasible, the technical difficulties which would preclude the successful use
of the control options on the affected emission unit shall be identified;
C. A ranking of the technically feasible control options in order of overall control
effectiveness for NOx emissions. The list
shall present the array of control options and
shall include, at a minimum, the following
information:
(I) The baseline emissions of NOX
before implementation of each control option;
(II) The estimated emission reduction potential or the estimated control efficiency of each control option;
(III) The estimated emissions after
the application of each control option; and
(IV) The economic impacts of each
control option, including both overall cost
effectiveness and incremental cost effectiveness; and
D. An evaluation of cost effectiveness
of each control option consistent with OAQPS
Control Cost Manual (Fourth Edition), EPA
450/3-90-006 January 1990 and subsequent
revisions. The evaluation shall be conducted
in accordance with the following requirements:
(I) The cost effectiveness shall be
evaluated in terms of dollars per ton of NOx
emission reduction;
(II) The cost effectiveness shall be
calculated on average and incremental bases
for each option. Average cost effectiveness is
calculated as the annualized cost of the control option divided by the baseline emissions
rate minus the control option emission rate,
as shown by the following formula:
Cost Effectiveness Equation
Average Cost Effectiveness ($/ton NOx
removed) =
Total annualized cost of the control option
($/yr)
Baseline emission rate (tons/yr) –
Control option emission rate (tons/yr)
(III) For purposes of this paragraph, baseline emission rate represents the
maximum emissions before the implementation of the control option. The baseline emissions rate shall be established using either
test results or approved emission factors and
historical operating data; and
(IV) For purposes of this paragraph, the incremental cost effectiveness calculation compares the costs and emission
level of a control option to those of the next
most stringent option, as shown by the following formula:
Incremental Cost Equation
Incremental Cost per incremental ton
removed ($/ton)=
Total annualized cost for a control option
($/yr) – Total
annualized cost for the next most stringent
control option ($/yr)
The emission rate for the more stringent control option (tons/yr) –
The emission rate for the control option
(tons/yr)
4. Based upon this study, the director
shall provide a case-specific RACT determination which shall be implemented by the
owner or operator of the unit as expeditiously
as practicable but in no case later than May
1, 2002. This case-specific RACT determination shall be submitted to the administrator of
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(I) Any unit during periods of start up,
shutdown, or malfunction shall comply with
the requirements of 10 CSR 10-6.050.
(4) Reporting and Record Keeping.
(A) Reporting. Reporting shall be based on
the test methods identified in section (5) of
this rule.
1. The owner or operator of an emissions unit subject to subsections (3)(A),
(3)(C), (3)(D), (3)(E), (3)(F) and (3)(G) of
this rule shall comply with the following
requirements:
A. Submit for each NOx emissions
unit that uses a CEMS to demonstrate compliance, an annual report containing the date,
time and emissions rate in pounds NOx per
mmBtu of all thirty (30)-day rolling averages
greater than the emission rates allowed under
section (3) of this rule;
B. Submit for each NOx emissions
unit which uses stack tests to demonstrate
compliance, an annual report identifying
monthly fuel usage and monthly total heat
input; and
C. Submit a written report of all
stack tests completed after controls are effective to the director within sixty (60) days
Specific to the St. Louis Metropolitan Area
after completion of sample and data collection.
2. The owner or operator of an emissions
unit subject to subsection (3)(H) of this rule
shall comply with the reporting requirements
established in the case-by-case RACT determination approved by the director. The owners or
operators of emissions units complying with
the averaging provisions of subsection (3)(H)
shall submit to the director within thirty (30)
days after the end of each calendar month a
compliance report stating the averaged emission rate. The compliance report shall also
include the data used to determine the averaged emission rate. If the average emission
rate exceeds the allowable emission rate, the
owners and operators shall determine which
owner or operator is responsible for the violation. The owners and operators in the compliance report shall submit the identity of the
responsible owner or operator. The department will take enforcement action against
only the owner or operator responsible for
the violation. However, if the owners or
operators do not submit within thirty (30)
days the identity of the violator, both owners
or operators shall be responsible for the violation.
(B) Record Keeping.
1. Each owner or operator of an emissions unit subject to subsections (3)(A),
(3)(C), (3)(D), (3)(E), (3)(F) and (3)(G) of
this rule shall maintain records of the following:
A. Total fuel consumed on a monthly
basis unless the unit is operating a CEMS or
predictive emissions monitoring system
(PEMS);
B. The total heat input for each emissions unit on a monthly basis unless the unit
is operating a CEMS or a PEMS;
C. Reports of all stack testing conducted to meet the requirements of this rule;
D. All other data collected by a
CEMS or a PEMS necessary to convert the
monitoring data to the units of the applicable
emission limitation;
E. If a CEMS is used, all performance evaluations conducted in the past year;
F. All CEMS or monitoring device
calibration checks;
G. All monitoring system, monitoring
device and performance testing measurements;
H. Records of adjustments and maintenance performed on monitoring systems
and devices; and
I. A log identifying each period during which the CEMS was inoperative, except
for zero and span checks, and the nature of
the repairs and adjustments performed to
make the system operative.
2. The owner or operator of an emissions unit subject to subsection (3)(H) of this
rule shall comply with the record keeping
requirements established in the case-by-case
RACT determination approved by the director.
3. All records must be kept on-site for a
period of five (5) years and made available to
the department upon request.
(5) Test Methods.
(A) Compliance Testing. Initial compliance for all units subject to subsections
(3)(A), (3)(C), (3)(D), (3)(E) or (3)(G) of
this rule shall be determined through a stack
test performed prior to the implementation
date under section (1) of this rule except
those units complying with the provisions of
subsection (5)(B) of this rule. After the initial stack test, stack tests shall be required
every three (3) years to determine compliance
except for units complying with the provisions of subsection (5)(B) of this rule. The
following test methods shall be used for all
stack tests:
1. 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A,
Method 7, 7A, 7C, 7D or 7E shall be used to
determine NOx concentrations in stack gases;
2. 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A, Method
1A, 2, 2A, 2B, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, or 2H shall
be used to determine the exit velocity of stack
gases;
3. 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A, Method
3 or 3A shall be used to determine carbon
dioxide, oxygen, excess air and molecular
weight of stack gases;
4. 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A, Method
4 shall be used to determine moisture content
of stack gases from applicable stationary
sources;
5. 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A, Method
19 shall be used to determine (calculate or
compute) NOx (heat input specific) emission
rates (pound per mmBtu); and
6. For stationary combustion turbines,
40 CFR Part 60 Appendix A, Method 20 may
be used to determine NOx concentrations.
(B) Monitoring. As an alternative to the
compliance testing required under subsection
(5)(A) for units subject to subsections (3)(A),
(3)(C), (3)(D), (3)(E) and (3)(G) of this rule,
an owner or operator of an emission unit may
install, calibrate, maintain and operate a
CEMS or a PEMS approved by the director
and the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), or use an equivalent procedure for measuring or estimating NOx emissions approved by the director and the EPA.
For units operating CEMS, PEMS or an
equivalent
procedure
for
estimating
NOxemissions, the following requirements
shall apply:
1. Compliance shall be measured on a
thirty (30)-day rolling average;
2. All valid data shall be used for calculating NOx emissions rates;
3. The procedures under 40 CFR
60.13(d), (e) and (f) and 40 CFR Part 60
Appendix B, Performance Specification 2
shall be followed, or other procedures
approved by the director; for the installation,
evaluation and operation of CEMS or PEMS;
4. Quarterly accuracy and daily calibration drift tests shall be performed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60 Appendix F, or
other tests approved by the director; and
5. CEMS installed, certified and operated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 75 are
deemed to be approved by the director to
meet the monitoring and quality assurance
requirements of this subsection.
AUTHORITY: section 643.050, RSMo 2000.*
Original rule filed July 15, 1999, effective
Feb. 29, 2000. Amended: Filed Aug. 26,
2005, effective May 30, 2006.
*Original authority: 643.050, RSMo 1965, amended
1972, 1992, 1993, 1995.