12 CSR 10-110.920
Sales of Grains, Seed, Pesticides, Herbicides and Fertilizers
PURPOSE: Sections 144.030.2(1), (22), and (32), RSMo, exempt the
sales of certain grains, seed, pesticides, limestone, fertilizer and
herbicides. This rule explains the requirements that must be met in
order to qualify for these exemptions. Section 144.020.1(3), RSMo,
taxes certain utility services. This rule explains the application of
this taxing provision for sales to agricultural consumers.
(1) In general, the sale of grains to be converted into foodstuffs
or seed, and limestone, fertilizer, and herbicides used in
connection with the growth or production of crops, livestock
or poultry is exempt from tax.
(2) Definition of Terms.
(A) Herbicides—Chemical substances used to destroy or
inhibit the growth of plants, especially weeds.
(B) Livestock—See 12 CSR 10-110.900.
(C) Pesticides—Chemicals used to kill pests, especially insects.
Pesticides include adjuvants such as crop oils, surfactants,
wetting agents and other pesticide carriers used to improve or
enhance the effect of a pesticide and the foam used to mark
the application of pesticides and herbicides for the production
of crops, livestock or poultry.
(3) Basic Application of Tax.
(A) The sale of grain to be converted into foodstuffs ultimately
sold in processed form at retail is exempt.
(B) The sale of seed, lime or fertilizer used in producing crops
that will be sold at retail or will be fed to livestock or poultry to
be sold ultimately in processed form at retail is exempt.
(C) Sales of pesticides or herbicides used in the production of
crops, orchards, aquaculture, livestock or poultry are exempt.
(D) Seed, pesticides and fertilizers sold for nonagricultural
use are subject to tax. Sales of fertilizer for lawns, shrubbery and
similar ornamental uses and seeds for ornamental purposes
are examples of sales subject to tax.
(E) The sale of electricity, water, and gas used for agricultural
production is exempt.
(4) Examples.
(A) A pesticide dealer sells pesticides to an orchard to spray
on the fruit trees to kill insects. The sale of the pesticide is not
subject to tax.
(B) An agricultural chemical dealer sells foam marker to
a farmer to aid in determining where herbicides have been
sprayed on crops. The sale of the foam marker is not subject
to tax.
(C) A seed dealer sells seed, pesticides and fertilizer to a
construction company for use on a construction site. These
sales are subject to tax.
(D) A pesticide dealer sells fly spray for dairy cattle and rat
and mouse poison for use in the dairy barn. The sale of the fly
spray is not subject to tax. The sale of the rat and mouse poison
is not subject to tax because it is used in the production of an
agriculture product.
AUTHORITY: section 144.270, RSMo 1994.* Original rule filed Jan.
3, 2000, effective July 30, 2000.
*Original authority: 144.270, RSMo 1939, amended 1941, 1943, 1945, 1947, 1955, 1961.
Conagra Poultry Co. v. Director of Revenue, 862 S.W.2d 915
(Mo. banc 1993). Wood shavings were sold by the taxpayer, a
turkey processor, to its contractors as part of the contractors’
compensation for raising the turkeys. The contractors expected
to use as fertilizer all the litter that the turkey-raising operation
would produce in their own farming. The court ruled that at
the time the wood shavings passed to the contractors, the wood
shavings had no value as fertilizer. The wood shaving become
fertilizer upon absorbing nutrients in the turkey droppings. The
wood shavings were not exempt as materials used in processing
because even though the wood shavings became a component
part of the fertilizer, the contractors used the fertilizer for their
own farming and did not sell any products for final use or
consumption.
Norwin G. Heimos Greenhouse, Inc. v. Director of Revenue,
724 S.W.2d 505 (Mo. banc 1987). Gas, water and electricity were
used for the operation of greenhouses. A refund was requested on
tax paid on utilities used in the greenhouse’s production of flower
and vegetable plants for sale to retailers. The court found that the
greenhouse’s use of utilities constituted agricultural consumption
and was not subject to sales tax under Section 144.020.1(3),
RSMo. The legislatures distinguished between agricultural and
commercial in the property tax statutes and the Employment
Security Law. The court concluded that the legislature also
intended that agricultural consumers be considered as a class
separate from commercial consumers for sales tax purposes.