10 CSR 60-4.040
Maximum Synthetic Organic Chemical Contaminant Levels and Monitoring Requirements
PURPOSE: This rule establishes maximum
contaminant levels and monitoring requirements for synthetic organic chemical contaminants.
(1) The following are the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) for synthetic organic
chemical contaminants.
Maximum
Contaminant Level,
Contaminant
Milligrams Per Liter
1. Alachlor
0.002
2. Atrazine
0.003
3. Benzo(a)pyrene
0.0002
4. Carbofuran
0.04
5. Chlordane
0.002
6. Dalapon
0.2
7. Di(2-ethylhexyl)
adipate
0.4
8. Dibromochloropropane (DBCP)
0.0002
9. Di(2-ethylhexyl)
phthlate
0.006
10. Dinoseb
0.007
11. Diquat
0.02
12. Endothall
0.1
13. Endrin
0.002
14. 2,4-D
0.07
15. Ethylene dibromide
(EDB)
0.00005
16. Glyphosate
0.7
17. Heptachlor
0.0004
18. Heptachlor epoxide
0.0002
19. Hexachlorobenzene
0.001
20. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.05
21. Lindane
0.0002
22. Methoxychlor
0.04
23. Oxamyl (Vydate)
0.2
24. Picloram
0.5
25. Polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs)
0.0005 (as
determined by
Method
508A only)
26. Pentachlorophenol
0.001
27. Simazine
0.004
28. Toxaphene
0.003
29. 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) 0.00000003
30. 2,4,5-TP (Silvex)
0.05
(2) For the purpose of determining compliance with MCLs, a supplier of water must
collect samples of the product water for analysis as follows:
(A) During the initial three (3)-year compliance period, all community and nontransient noncommunity water systems must collect an initial round of four (4) consecutive
quarterly samples unless a waiver has been
granted by the department. The department
will designate the year in which each system
samples within this compliance period;
(B) All public water systems shall sample
at points in the distribution system representative of each water source or at each entry
point to the distribution system. The sampling point will be after the application of
treatment, if any. Each sample must be taken
at the same sampling point unless conditions
make another sampling point more representative of each source or treatment plant;
(C) If the system draws water from more
than one (1) source and the sources are combined before distribution, the system must
sample at an entry point to the distribution
system during periods of normal operating
conditions; and
(D) The department may require more frequent monitoring than specified in this section of the rule and may require confirmation
samples for positive or negative results, at its
discretion.
(3) If contaminants are not detected during
the initial sampling as indicated in section (2)
of this rule, systems may decrease their sampling frequency beginning in the next three
(3)-year compliance period.
(A) Systems that serve greater than three
thousand three hundred (>3,300) persons
may reduce their sampling frequencies to two
(2) quarterly samples at each sampling point
in one (1) year in each compliance period.
(B) Systems that serve less than or equal to
three thousand three hundred (≤3,300) persons may reduce their sampling frequencies
to one (1) sample in each compliance period.
(4) The department may allow sampling data
collected between January 1, 1990 and
December 31, 1995, to satisfy the initial base
sampling requirements, if the sampling was
completed as required by subsections (2)(B)
and (C) of this rule.
(5) If contaminants are detected in any sample, then systems must sample quarterly
beginning in the next quarter at each sampling point which resulted in a detection.
(A) Groundwater systems must sample a
minimum of two (2) quarters and surface
water must sample a minimum of four (4)
quarters to establish a baseline.
(B) If the MCL is exceeded as described in
subsection (5)(E) or (F) of this rule, then systems must sample quarterly beginning in the
next quarter. Systems must sample a minimum of four (4) quarters to establish a baseline.
(C) If the baseline indicates a system’s analytical results are reliably and consistently
below the MCL, the department may reduce
the system’s sampling frequency to annually.
(Annual sampling must be conducted during
the quarter which previously yielded the
highest analytical result.)
(D) Systems which have three (3) consecutive annual samples with no detection of a
contaminant may apply to the department for
a waiver.
(E) If one (1) sampling point is in violation
of an MCL, the system is in violation of the
MCL.
1. For systems monitoring more than
once per year, compliance with the MCL is
determined by a running annual average at
each sampling point.
2. Systems monitoring annually or less
frequently whose sample result exceeds the
regulatory detection level as defined by 10
CSR 60-5.010(6)(B) must begin quarterly
sampling. The system will not be considered
in violation of the MCL until it has completed one (1) year of quarterly sampling.
3. If any sample result will cause the
running annual average to exceed the MCL at
any sampling point, the system is out of compliance with the MCL immediately.
4. If a system fails to collect the required
number of samples, compliance will be based
on the total number of samples collected.
5. If a sample result is less than the
detection limit, zero will be used to calculate
the annual average.
(F) If monitoring results in detection of
one (1) or more of certain related contaminants (aldicarb, aldicarb sulfone, aldicarb
sulfoxide and heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide), then subsequent monitoring shall analyze for all related contaminants.
(6) A public water system may apply to the
department for a waiver from required sampling. Systems are eligible for reduced monitoring in the initial three (3)-year compliance
period. The waiver is effective for one (1)
compliance period. It must be renewed in
subsequent compliance periods or the system
must conduct sampling as required by subsection (2)(A) of this rule.
(A) A public water system may apply to the
department for a use waiver for reduced monitoring from required sampling if previous
use of the chemical can be ruled out as
required by 10 CSR 60-6.060(2).
(B) A public water system may apply to the
department for a susceptibility waiver for
reduced monitoring contingent on the conduct of a thorough vulnerability assessment
as required by 10 CSR 60-6.060(3).
(7) As determined by the department, a confirmation sample may be required for either
positive or negative results. If a confirmation
sample is used, the compliance determination
is based on the average of the results of both
the confirmation sample and the initial sample. The department has the discretion to
delete results of obvious sampling errors
from this calculation.
(8) Any public water system violating MCLs
or monitoring and reporting requirements for
any of the contaminants listed in section (1)
of this rule must notify the department within seven (7) days and give public notice as
required by 10 CSR 60-8.010.
(9) Treatment Techniques.
(A) All public water systems shall use
treatment techniques in lieu of MCLs for
specified contaminants.
(B) Each public water system must certify
annually in writing to the department (using
third-party or manufacturers’ certification)
that when acrylamide and epichlorohydrin are
used in drinking water systems, the combination (or product) of dose and monomer level
does not exceed the levels specified as follows:
Acrylamide = 0.05% dosed at 1 part per
million (ppm) (or equivalent)
Epichlorohydrin = 0.01% dosed at 20 ppm
(or equivalent)
Certifications can rely on manufacturers or
third parties, as approved by the department.
(10) All new systems or systems that use a
new source of water that begin operation after
January 22, 2004 must demonstrate compliance with the MCL or treatment technique
within a period of time specified by the
department. The system must also comply
with the initial sampling frequencies specified by the department to ensure a system can
demonstrate compliance with the MCL or
treatment technique. Routine and increased
monitoring frequencies shall be conducted in
accordance with the requirements in section
(5) of this rule.
AUTHORITY: section 640.100, RSMo Supp.
2002.* Original rule filed May 4, 1979,
effective Sept. 14, 1979. Amended: Filed
April 14, 1981, effective Oct. 11, 1981.
Rescinded and readopted: Filed March 31,
1992, effective Dec. 3, 1992. Amended: Filed
May 4, 1993, effective Jan. 13, 1994.
Amended: Filed Feb. 1, 1996, effective Oct.
30, 1996. Amended: Filed March 17, 2003,
effective Nov. 30, 2003.
*Original authority: 640.100, RSMo 1939, amended 1978,
1981, 1982, 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1995, 1996, 1998,
1999, 2002.