49-63a
Fees
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 49-63a
OPINION
49-63
May 13, 1949 (OPINION)
FEES
RE: Doctor on Insanity Board
Your letter of May 11 addressed to the Attorney General has
been received and contents noted.
The question you present, as I understand from the information in
your letter, is whether the physician who is a member of the insanity
board may charge the fee of five dollars for examining a patient in
addition to his per diem of five dollars.
Section 25-0311 provides, among other things, that the board shall
appoint a regularly practicing physician of the county, who may or
may not be a member of the board, to visit such person and make a
personal examination touching upon the truth of the allegations
contained in the information and upon the actual condition of such
person.
It is clear, therefore, that the physician who is a member of the
insanity board may also be appointed as the examining physician. In
other words, such physician, when appointed, acts in a dual capacity.
If he is appointed to examine the patient, such examination is a
function which he must perform in addition to his duties as a member
of the insanity board. Having made his examination he makes his
report to the board.
Section 25-0312 provides that, "As soon as practicable after the
return of the physician's statement to the insanity board, the board
shall conclude its investigation and determine whether or not the
person alleged to require treatment and observation at the state
hospital does in fact require the same."
It seems that there can be no doubt that where a physician who is a
member of the board is appointed by the board to make an examination
of the patient and he accepts such appointment, he is then acting in
the capacity other than as a member of the board. He is examining
the patient in order to ascertain whether or not in his judgment such
patient requires treatment and observation at the state hospital. He
then makes a report to the board and the board will then consider the
report and determine whether or not the patient is a fit subject for
custody of the hospital.
The writer of this letter was state's attorney in his county for ten
years and this was the practice that was invariably followed in such
cases. It is my opinion that where a physician who is a member of
the insanity board is appointed by the board to make an examination
of the patient, he is entitled to the five dollars provided for in
section 25-0315 in addition to his regular per diem of five dollars.
WALLACE E. WARNER
Attorney General