47-188
Motor Vehicles
Cite as N.D. Op. Att'y Gen. 47-188
OPINION
47-188
October 17, 1947 (OPINION)
MOTOR VEHICLES
RE: Taxation of Trailer Houses
This will acknowledge the receipt of your letter addressed to
Attorney General Nels G. Johnson under date of October 14, 1947. In
your letter you say:
Considerable misunderstanding and controversy is developing
incident to the assessment and taxation of house trailers.
Many of these house trailers have been placed on more or less
substantial foundations and are being used as residences in
many localities over the state. Some assessors have assessed
them as realty, others assessed them as personal property where
the affixation has been of a more temporary character."
You say further:
I have advised several of the local assessors that where the
license tag has not been obtained and applied and the trailer
house has not been placed on a more or less permanent
foundation, that it should be assessed as personal property,
and, if the trailer house has been permanently established on a
foundation, that it becomes a part of the realty and should be
so assessed. I have suggested to them also that where these
trailer houses have not been permanently affixed and are not
licensed, the assessor should advise the state patrol to the
end that they be properly licensed for the current year in
which case no other tax will apply."
It is my opinion that the views which you have expressed to the
assessors are substantially correct.
Section 39-0439 of the 1943 Revised Code is a part of Chapter 39-094
relating to motor vehicle registration and the provisions of this
section must be construed in connection with, and in the light of,
the other sections of said chapter relating to the licensing and
registration of motor vehicles. It was, in my opinion, clearly the
intention of the legislature that when a trailer house is used as a
vehicle for transportation on the highways of the state, and in that
connection only incidentally as a residence and place of abode, it
must be licensed under the provisions of section 39-0439; that as
long as the trailer house is primarily used as a vehicle for
transportation, it is subject to the tax prescribed by said section,
and that under the provisions of Section 39-0466 such license tax
must be regarded as a lieu tax.
But it is further my opinion, that when a trailer house is used
primarily for residential purposes or purposes other than a means of
conveyance, that it loses its character as a vehicle within the
intent and purpose of sections 39-0439 and 39-0466 of the Revised
Code. The fact that a house suitable for residential purposes, or
for purposes other than transportation, is so constructed that it can
be placed on wheels and hauled over the highways by an automobile
does not create exemption from general property taxation. Any other
construction would be discriminatory in its results, and a statute
conferring tax exemption would be regarded as discriminatory class
legislation.
It is my opinion that a trailer house used as a residence, and not
principally or primarily as a vehicle or means of conveyance, is
subject to assessment and taxation like any other structure of like
value which has not been built for use as a vehicle. And it is
further my conclusion, that a trailer house which is used as a
residence, and also occasionally used as a vehicle, is subject not
only to assessment and taxation but also to the license tax
prescribed by section 39-0439. The license tax is imposed for the
use of the highways and if a trailer house is driven on the highways,
it must be licensed.
If a trailer house, used as a residence, is readily movable, or if it
is located on leased ground, it should be assessed as personal
property. But if it is owned by the owner of the land on which it is
situated, and is attached to the soil like any other house or
structure assessed as realty in the community, it should be regarded
as real estate.
NELS G. JOHNSON
Attorney General