Rule 10-318 NMRA
Rule 10-318. Placement of Indian children.
A. Placement preferences. The court shall ensure that the department follows the
placement preferences established by the Indian Child Welfare Act and its regulations
when the following conditions are met:
(1)
the court finds at the custody hearing or any subsequent hearing that the
child is an Indian child or there is reason to know that the child is an Indian child; and
(2)
legal custody of the child is or has been transferred or awarded to the
department.
B. Applicability. The placement preferences must be applied in any foster care,
preadoptive, or adoptive placement by the department unless there is a determination
on the record that good cause exists to not apply those placement preferences.
C. Departure from placement preferences; good cause. If any party asserts that
good cause exists not to follow the placement preferences, the reasons for that belief or
assertion must be stated orally on the record or provided in writing to the parties to the
proceeding and the court. The party seeking departure from the placement preferences
bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that there is good cause
to depart from the placement preferences.
D. Good cause; determination.
(1)
Motion. The court shall determine whether good cause exists to depart
from the placement preferences upon the occurrence of the following:
(a) a written or oral motion by a party or the Tribe to determine whether good
cause exists to depart from the placement preferences; or
(b) the court’s own motion when it appears that a placement or recommended
placement may depart from the placement preferences.
(2)
Record; factual basis. A determination of good cause to depart from the
placement preferences shall be made on the record or in writing and shall include
factual findings based on evidence in the record or the stipulation of the parties. Any
hearing on a motion under this paragraph shall be held within thirty (30) days of the
motion.
E. Good cause; permissible considerations. A determination of good cause to
depart from the placement preferences must be based on one or more of the following
considerations:
(1)
the request of one or both of the Indian child’s parents, if they attest that
they have reviewed the placement options, if any, that comply with the order of
preference;
(2)
the request of the child, if the child is of sufficient age and capacity to
understand the decision that is being made;
(3)
the presence of a sibling attachment that can be maintained only through
a particular placement;
(4)
the extraordinary physical, mental, or emotional needs of the child, such
as specialized treatment services that may be unavailable in the community where
families who meet the placement preferences live; or
(5)
the unavailability of a suitable placement after a determination by the court
that a diligent search was conducted to find suitable placements meeting the preference
criteria, but none has been located. For purposes of this analysis, the standards for
determining whether a placement is unavailable must conform to the prevailing social
and cultural standards of the Indian community in which the Indian child’s parent or
extended family resides or with which the Indian child’s parent or extended family
members maintain social and cultural ties.
F. Good cause; impermissible considerations.
(1)
Socioeconomic status. A placement may not depart from the placement
preferences based on the socioeconomic status of any placement relative to another
placement.
(2)
Ordinary bonding or attachment. A placement may not depart from the
placement preferences based solely on ordinary bonding or attachment that flowed from
time spent in a non-preferred placement that was made in violation of ICWA.