1996-F3
View/download document
Cite as N.Y. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 1996-F3
NY CONST ART XVIII(2); PRIVATE HOUSING FINANCE LAW ART XXIV,
§§ 44, 45-a, 571, 920, 1051, 1100, 1110, 1120, 1130, 1172; PUBLIC
HOUSING LAW § 14; SOCIAL SERVICES LAW § 29; UNCONSOLIDATED LAWS
CH 252, §§ 5, 8622; 24 CFR §§ 92.1, 92.2, 92.105, 92.107; 42 USC
§§ 12704(2), (4), 12741, et seq.; L 1992 CH 794.
The Governor is authorized to designate the Housing Trust
Fund Corporation to administer the Federal Home Investments
Partnership Program without legislative approval.
March 13, 1996
Hon. Joseph H. Holland
Formal Opinion
Chairman
No. 96-F3
Housing Trust Fund Corporation
One Fordham Plaza
New York, New York 10458
Dear Commissioner Holland:
You have requested a formal opinion of the Attorney General
as to whether the Governor has authority to designate the Housing
Trust Fund Corporation to administer the Federal Home Investments
Partnership Program without legislative approval.
Generally, under the Home Investments Partnership Program
(Home Program), the Federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) allocates funds by formula to eligible state
and local governments in order to strengthen public-private
partnerships in the provision of more affordable housing. 24 CFR
§ 92.1; see also, 42 USC §§ 12741, et seq. Federal funds are
required to be matched by non-federal resources. Id. State and
local governments that become participating jurisdictions in the
Home Program may use Federal funds to carry out multi-year
housing strategies through acquisition, rehabilitation, and new
construction of housing, and tenant-based rental assistance. Id.
Participating jurisdictions may provide assistance in a number of
eligible forms approved by HUD including loans, advances, equity
investments and interest subsidies. Id.
One purpose of the Home Program is to expand the supply of
decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing with primary
attention given to rental housing for very low income persons.
Id. A second primary purpose is to mobilize and strengthen the
abilities of states and units of general local governments
throughout the United States to design and implement strategies
2
for achieving adequate supplies of this housing. Id. Also, the
Home Program provides participating jurisdictions with various
forms of Federal housing assistance, including capital
investment, mortgage insurance, and rental assistance. Id.
In 1992, the State Legislature enacted Article XXIV of the
Private Housing Finance Law, which designated the Division of
Housing and Community Renewal (Division) to administer the
provisions of the Home Program on behalf of New York State.
L 1992, ch 794. Article XXIV also sets forth various Program
requirements. Private Housing Finance Law § 1172. The
significant provision underlying this opinion request is
Notwithstanding any contrary provision of
law, on and after June thirtieth, nineteen
hundred ninety-five, the division shall not
issue notices of fund availability, accept
applications or enter into any new agreements
pursuant to the provisions of this section.
Id., § 1172(7). This provision, barring the Division from taking
action to make new awards under the Home Program, apparently was
intended to provide the Legislature with an opportunity to review
the administration of the Program by the Division.
In the 1995-1996 session of the Legislature, the Senate and
the Assembly failed to reach agreement on a continuation of the
Division's authority to administer the Home Program. While both
Houses favored an extension of the Division's authority, the
Assembly until June 30, 1996, and the Senate until June 30, 1998,
the Assembly bill also included an increase in the cap on the
Housing Bond Program, the so-called SCOR Bonds. S5329; A8080.
This proposed increase was unrelated to the Home Program.
New York State Assembly Memorandum in Support of Legislation,
A8080.
You have indicated that HUD representatives have stated that
due to the Legislature's failure to extend the Division's
authority to administer the Home Program, previous submissions by
the State to HUD may be considered invalid.
HUD may revoke a jurisdiction's designation
as a participating jurisdiction if . . . HUD
finds . . . that the jurisdiction is
unwilling or unable to carry out the
provisions of [the Home Program]. . . . When
HUD revokes a participating jurisdiction's
designation as a participating jurisdiction,
3
HUD will reallocate any remaining funds in
the jurisdiction's HOME Investment Trust
Fund.
24 CFR § 92.107. In jeopardy is 24.4 million dollars allocated
to New York State in Federal fiscal year 1995.
To continue New York's status as a participating
jurisdiction, the Governor has officially notified Secretary
Cisneros of HUD that he has designated the New York State Housing
Trust Fund Corporation to act on behalf of New York State with
regard to the provisions of the Home Program. The designation is
effective with respect to the grant agreement representing funds
for the 1995 Federal fiscal year with the Division continuing to
administer all previous years' funding agreements.
Under Federal law, a state may qualify as a participating
jurisdiction for purposes of the Home Program through "any agency
or instrumentality thereof that is established pursuant to
legislation and designated by the chief executive officer to act
on behalf of the State with regard to the provisions of this Act
[Part]". 42 USC § 12704(2), (4); 24 CFR § 92.2. Thus, the
designation by the Governor of the Housing Trust Fund
Corporation, a corporation existing under provisions of State law
(Private Housing Finance Law § 45-a), clearly meets the
requirements of Federal law for eligibility to qualify as a
participating jurisdiction. Federal law does not require that
the Legislature concur with the designation by the Governor.
Actual designation as a "participating jurisdiction" does not
require any action by the State Legislature under Federal
regulations. 24 CFR § 92.105.
Compliance with the provisions of Federal law governing
qualification of a state as a participating jurisdiction in the
Home Program is all that is required and authorized. The overlay
of additional or inconsistent requirements by a state would
violate Federal law.
The designation by the Governor of the Housing Trust Fund
Corporation for the future administration of the Home Program is
not inconsistent with New York State law. Section 1172(7) of the
Private Housing Finance Law prohibits the Division from issuing
notices of fund availability, accepting applications or entering
into new agreements after June 30, 1995. This provision does not
state or imply that the Home Program cannot be administered by
New York State subsequent to the termination of the Division's
authority regarding new agreements. Designation by the Governor
of a different entity, the Housing Trust Fund Corporation, to
4
administer the Home Program, is not inconsistent with any
provisions of State law. Indeed, acquiescence by the Legislature
to the continuation of the Home Program in the State is evidenced
by inclusion in the Capital Budget of administrative funds to the
Division for purposes of the Program. Capital Projects Budget,
1995-1996. In that the Division is authorized by Private Housing
Finance Law § 45-a(11) to provide services to the Housing Trust
Fund Corporation, the designation of the Corporation by the
Governor is consistent with the Legislature's appropriation. The
Housing Trust Fund Corporation has authority to administer the
Home Program on behalf of the State. Among its extensive powers
in the housing field, the Corporation is authorized to facilitate
the coordination of existing State, Federal and local programs
which promote the development of low income housing. Private
Housing Finance Law § 45-a(9).
Thus, the Governor clearly had authority to designate the
Housing Trust Fund Corporation to administer the Home Program,
without legislative approval. The Home Program statute and
regulations for State participation provide this authorization to
the Governor. There is no State law that terminates the State's
participation in the Home Program, designates a different agency
to administer the Home Program on the State's behalf or requires
legislative approval to designate an agency to administer the
Home Program. Such a requirement would be inconsistent with
Federal law.
Also, the position that as a matter of State law legislative
approval of the designation is required is an intrusion on the
powers of the Governor as the chief executive officer of the
State. Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781 (1995); Clark v Cuomo, 66
NY2d 185 (1985). The constitutional principle of separation of
powers, implied by the separate grants of power to each of the
coordinate branches of government, requires that the Legislature
make policy while the Executive Branch's responsibility is to
implement that policy. Bourquin, supra, p 784. The Legislature
has made the policy decision to continue participating in the
Home Program through its approval of funds in the Capital Budget
specifically for the Program. Also, the Housing Trust Fund
Corporation, which has been designated by the Governor, has been
specifically authorized by the Legislature to facilitate
coordination of local housing partnerships and existing State,
Federal and local programs which promote the development of low
income housing. Private Housing Finance Law § 45-a(9). From a
Program perspective, the designation by the Governor of the
Housing Trust Fund Corporation is all that is necessary in that
Federal laws and regulations governing the Home Program fully set
forth Program requirements. No further act of the State
5
Legislature is necessary for administration of the Home Program
based on this comprehensive setting forth of Program
requirements.
Other State statutes evidence a legislative policy to
implement Federal and State housing programs and establish a
broad basis for the Governor's designation for the Home Program.
Bourquin, supra; Cuomo, supra. Article XVIII(2) of the New York
State Constitution authorizes the Legislature to participate in
Federal housing programs and the Legislature has implemented this
authority by granting powers to various State entities to
participate in these programs. See, Social Services Law § 29 -
Department of Social Services; Unconsolidated Laws § 6252 - Urban
Development Corporation; Public Housing Law § 14 - Division of
Housing and Community Renewal; Private Housing Finance Law § 44 -
Housing Finance Agency. The Legislature has enacted programs
similar to the Home Program. See, Private Housing Finance Law
§§ 571, 920, 1051, 1100, 1110, 1120, 1130; Unconsolidated Laws
§ 8622.
The failure of the Legislature to enact legislation
extending the authority of the Division to administer the Home
Program on behalf of the State does not indicate legislative
disapproval of the designation by the Governor. Bourquin, supra,
pp 787-788. "Legislative inaction, because of its inherent
ambiguity, `affords the most dubious foundation for drawing
positive inferences'". Clark, supra, pp 190-191. In any event,
the failure of the Legislature to agree only prohibited the
Division from taking further action to enter into new agreements
under the Home Program but did not bar the State from continuing
to participate in the Program or prohibit the Governor from
following Federal statutory guidelines in the designation,
without legislative approval, of a new entity, the Housing Trust
Fund Corporation, to administer the Home Program.
We conclude that the Governor is authorized to designate the
Housing Trust Fund Corporation to administer the Federal Home
Investments Partnership Program without legislative approval.
Very truly yours,
DENNIS C. VACCO
Attorney General