1995-44
View/download document
Cite as N.Y. Op. Att'y Gen. No. 1995-44
1Formerly § 167-b, prior to enactment of new article 11.
See, L 1995, ch 83.
CONSOLIDATED LAWS OF NEW YORK, BOOK 1, § 98; STATE FINANCE LAW
§ 165; L 1991 CH 663.
State Finance Law § 165 was intended to prohibit the
purchase of only those species of tropical hardwoods listed in
the statute. We also conclude that the exemption for products
from "a sustained, managed forest" is not defined in the statute.
September 5, 1995
Jeffrey Schanback, Esq.
Informal Opinion
New York City Housing Authority
No. 95-44
Law Department
75 Park Place,
New York, NY 10007
Dear Mr. Schanback:
You have asked for an opinion on the scope of State Finance
Law § 165.1 That section, which was originally enacted in 1991,
provides that
Except as hereinafter provided, the state and any
governmental agency or political subdivision or public benefit
corporation of the state shall not purchase or obtain for any purpose
any tropical hardwoods or tropical hardwood products, wholesale or
retail, in any form.
State Finance Law § 165(2)(a).
"Tropical hardwood" is defined as "any and all hardwood,
scientifically classified as angiosperm, that grows in any
tropical moist forest". State Finance Law § 165(1)(b). The
definition goes on to state that "tropical hardwoods shall be the
following species" and includes a list of approximately forty
species. Id. You have pointed out that the first sentence of
the definition embraces many tropical hardwoods that are not
included on the list. You ask whether the list of species
included in the statute is intended to be exhaustive or simply
illustrative.
Initially, we note that the statute contains two lists.
Section 1(a) defines non-tropical hardwood species as
2
any and all hardwood that grows in any geographically temperate
regions, as defined by the United States Forest Service, and is similar
to tropical hardwood in density, texture, grain, stability or durability.
The section goes on to state
Non-tropical hardwoods, the use or purchase of which shall be
preferred under this article, shall include, but not be limited to the
following species:
. . .
A list of species follows. The list of non-tropical hardwoods is
expressly stated to be illustrative and not exclusive. By
contrast, the section dealing with tropical hardwoods does not by
its terms include species that are not on the list. The
Legislature's goal was to promote use of non-tropical hardwoods
as substitutes for the woods it barred the State from purchasing.
A broad definition of acceptable substitutes is in accord with
that goal. If the Legislature intended the list of tropical
hardwoods in section 165(1)(b) to be illustrative and not
exhaustive, presumably it would have used the same language it
employed in section 165(1)(a).
A narrow, precise definition of the prohibited products is
in accord with the legislative scheme. During debate on this
legislation in the Assembly, the sponsor stated
what we are doing here is saying that these particular species which
have been reviewed with people at the Department of Environmental
Conservation, experts in forestry, that these species should not be
used unless there is no acceptable substitute.
Assembly Debate, July 3, 1991, p 49. He also stated that
the state in setting an example, should not purchase these particular
species of woods because they come from a sensitive area and we do
not want to encourage these species being destroyed.
Id., p 63. He also recognized that the bill was only a start on
managing a complex problem. Id., p 64.
We conclude that the statute was intended to prohibit the
purchase of only those species of tropical hardwoods listed in
the statute.
You also note that the prohibition contained in subsection 2
of the statute is subject to a number of exceptions.
Section 165(2)(b)(i) states that the prohibition on purchase of
3
2The Forest Stewardship Council has begun accrediting
certification organizations based on a number of criteria
including adherence to guidelines that define forest stewardship
as environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial and
economically viable forest management. See, J. Barrett,
"Accreditation Offers Producers Cleaner Image", Pulp & Paper
International, Vol. 36, No. 12, December 1994.
tropical hardwood shall not apply to "any hardwoods purchased
from a sustained, managed forest". You note that the phrase
"sustained, managed forest" is not defined in the statute and ask
for clarification in order to determine from whom you may
purchase such products.
Legislative history provides little guidance on this
question. A letter from one of the sponsors to the Governor's
counsel states:
Subdivision 3 of the bill provides exemptions that are
reasonable and do not penalize countries that are trying to manage
their forest products industry. Brazil is currently certifying their
exports of tropical hardwoods that come from the managed forests
currently under United Nations supervision. Vendors can easily
ascertain and certify that the products come from managed forests.
July 23, 1991 letter to the Governor's Counsel from Assemblyman
G. Oliver Koppell, Bill Jacket, L 1991, ch 663. No definition of
managed forests is included in section 165, nor did we locate any
statutory definitions. We note that a number of independent
non-profit organizations maintain wood products certification
programs that evaluate the environmental performance of
producers, including whether they practice sustained yield
management. See, K. Koenig "Green Labelling Taking Root" Wood &
Wood Products, Vol. 99, No. 3, March 1994; R. Vlosky and L.
Ozanne, "Consumer Anxiety Fuels Certification Movement", Wood
Technology, Vol. 122, No. 2, March 1995.2
We conclude that State Finance Law § 165 prohibits purchase
of only those species of tropical hardwoods listed in the
statute. The exemption for products from "a sustained, managed
forest" is not defined in the statute.
4
The Attorney General renders formal opinions only to
officers and departments of State government. This perforce is
an informal and unofficial expression of the views of this
office.
Very truly yours,
SIOBHAN S. CRARY
Assistant Attorney General